12.07.2015 Views

estimation des effets propres des mesures agroenvironnementales ...

estimation des effets propres des mesures agroenvironnementales ...

estimation des effets propres des mesures agroenvironnementales ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Tableau 5.22 – Résultats <strong>des</strong> <strong>estimation</strong>s de l’effet de la MAE 1993(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)STH 1769.46 ∗∗∗ 1685.73 ∗∗∗ 1526.31 ∗∗∗ 1508.28 ∗∗∗ -448.51 2360.58 ∗∗∗ -670.09 ∗∗∗ 2360.44 ∗∗∗ 1398.20 1770.79(139.57) (112.73) (149.16) (190.05) (561.97) (284.30) (188.45) (219.90) (3421.94) (2380.96)STH (%) .03 ∗∗∗ .009 .04 ∗∗∗ .03 ∗∗∗ .05 ∗∗∗ .03 ∗∗∗ .05 ∗∗∗ .03 ∗∗∗ .07 .04(.008) (.007) (.009) (.007) (.01) (.008) (.01) (.005) (.27) (.12)SCOP -316.84 ∗∗∗ -177.52 ∗∗∗ -248.86 ∗∗∗ -96.54 -1368.98 ∗∗∗ -241.86 ∗∗∗ -1224.45 ∗∗∗ -246.98 ∗∗∗ -1448.22 -232.02(84.63) (55.41) (85.38) (60.27) (185.45) (60.22) (122.66) (46.32) (1925.72) (746.84)SCOP (%) -.06 ∗∗∗ -.03 ∗∗∗ -.07 ∗∗∗ -.04 ∗∗∗ -.09 ∗∗∗ -.04 ∗∗∗ -.09 ∗∗∗ -.05 ∗∗∗ -.12 -.04(.008) (.006) (.007) (.005) (.01) (.005) (.007) (.003) (.18) (.08)Pr.artif. 48.03 ∗∗∗ -48.59 ∗ 67.46 ∗∗∗ -52.72 ∗ -28.43 39.59 -1.67 -1.02 175.71 354.80(18.53) (25.35) (18.27) (28.41) (38.14) (54.24) (19.79) (28.52) (741.81) (1371.95)Pr.artif. (%) .0009 -.008 ∗∗ .003 -.006 .0007 .007 .003 -.0008 .01 .02(.003) (.004) (.003) (.004) (.005) (.007) (.003) (.005) (.09) (.15)Fourrage 12.90 62.55 ∗∗∗ 16.28 67.20 ∗∗∗ -77.90 ∗∗ 56.44 ∗∗ -71.32 ∗∗ 97.08 ∗∗∗ -61.24 37.56(20.44) (16.64) (34.07) (16.58) (32.77) (27.15) (28.50) (23.52) (523.25) (234.37)Fourrage (%) -.003 .006 ∗∗∗ -.002 .005 ∗∗ -.004 .0002 -.003 .003 -.007 -.002(.002) (.002) (.003) (.002) (.003) (.002) (.003) (.002) (.05) (.03)Pr.temp. 259.02 ∗∗∗ 308.03 ∗∗∗ 247.48 ∗∗∗ 209.47 ∗∗∗ -204.35 -105.31 96.29 291.01 ∗∗∗ -192.12 56.71(72.55) (66.31) (69.49) (55.39) (163.39) (186.31) (64.04) (69.99) (2812.56) (2128.74)Pr.temp. (%) -.04 ∗∗∗ .02 ∗∗ -.03 ∗∗∗ .01 -.007 -.03 ∗∗∗ .007 -.01 -.05 -.03(.01) (.009) (.01) (.009) (.009) (.009) (.007) (.008) (.20) (.26)SAU 2073.45 ∗∗∗ 1939.69 ∗∗∗ 1818.89 ∗∗∗ 1755.84 ∗∗∗ -692.94 2670.51 ∗∗∗ -932.96 ∗∗∗ 2690.95 ∗∗∗ 1481.43 1972.86(174.88) (131.03) (173.06) (197.38) (595.96) (328.20) (242.69) (225.81) (4824.28) (3024.22)Chargement .94 ∗∗∗ 1.69 ∗∗∗ .97 ∗∗∗ 1.65 ∗∗∗ -.21 .99 ∗∗∗ -.23 1.03 ∗∗∗ .87 1.22(.09) (.11) (.09) (.11) (.58) (.19) (.57) (.18) (5.73) (5.34)Note : Les estimateurs sont décrits dans le tableau 3.1. Les écart-types apparaissent entre parenthèses. Les symboles ∗∗∗ (resp.∗∗, ∗) indiquent une significativité auseuil de 1% (resp. 5%, 10%).Source : Calculs <strong>des</strong> auteurs.5.5 L’effet <strong>des</strong> <strong>mesures</strong> herbagères sur les prairies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!