estimation des effets propres des mesures agroenvironnementales ...
estimation des effets propres des mesures agroenvironnementales ...
estimation des effets propres des mesures agroenvironnementales ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
94Tableau 5.23 – Résultats <strong>des</strong> <strong>estimation</strong>s de l’effet de la MAE 20(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)STH 1312.38 ∗∗∗ 1093.23 ∗∗∗ 1223.84 ∗∗∗ 1094.84 ∗∗∗ 467.54 ∗∗∗ 914.78 ∗∗∗ 427.29 ∗∗∗ 927.97 ∗∗∗ 1085.79 1114.51 ∗∗(63.60) (69.35) (71.00) (76.86) (97.44) (74.35) (72.06) (57.41) (734.22) (514.24)STH (%) .05 ∗∗∗ .01 ∗∗∗ .05 ∗∗∗ .01 ∗∗∗ .08 ∗∗∗ .01 ∗∗∗ .08 ∗∗∗ .01 ∗∗∗ .06 .02(.004) (.004) (.003) (.003) (.005) (.003) (.004) (.002) (.06) (.05)SCOP -228.16 ∗∗∗ -13.66 -231.99 ∗∗∗ -20.31 -1444.03 ∗∗∗ -103.52 ∗∗∗ -1441.28 ∗∗∗ -101.69 ∗∗∗ -376.54 -77.46(40.84) (30.27) (40.10) (29.89) (82.96) (29.96) (68.37) (22.50) (683.15) (388.20)SCOP (%) -.05 ∗∗∗ -.02 ∗∗∗ -.05 ∗∗∗ -.02 ∗∗∗ -.09 ∗∗∗ -.02 ∗∗∗ -.09 ∗∗∗ -.02 ∗∗∗ -.05 -.02(.003) (.003) (.003) (.003) (.004) (.002) (.003) (.001) (.04) (.03)Pr.artif. 5.79 -38.97 ∗∗ 8.15 -33.53 ∗∗ -50.08 ∗∗ 51.10 ∗ -58.48 ∗∗∗ 54.58 ∗∗ -6.24 11.45(10.90) (16.95) (10.83) (16.89) (19.47) (28.59) (15.07) (22.95) (237.56) (364.45)Pr.artif. (%) -.001 -.002 -.001 -.001 -.002 .008 ∗∗ -.003 ∗∗ .007 ∗∗∗ -.0003 .002(.002) (.003) (.002) (.003) (.002) (.003) (.002) (.003) (.03) (.04)Fourrage -91.77 ∗∗∗ -18.37 ∗∗ -90.40 ∗∗∗ -19.21 ∗∗ -202.17 ∗∗∗ -20.62 ∗ -192.25 ∗∗∗ -17.48 ∗ -85.63 -14.16(10.87) (8.12) (10.17) (8.21) (23.31) (11.97) (18.19) (9.55) (333.70) (166.05)Fourrage (%) -.02 ∗∗∗ -.004 ∗∗∗ -.02 ∗∗∗ -.004 ∗∗∗ -.01 ∗∗∗ -.007 ∗∗∗ -.009 ∗∗∗ -.007 ∗∗∗ -.01 -.005(.001) (.0009) (.001) (.0009) (.002) (.0009) (.001) (.0008) (.02) (.01)Pr.temp. 217.26 ∗∗∗ 220.91 ∗∗ 217.00 ∗∗∗ 226.00 ∗∗∗ -145.26 ∗∗ -64.55 -59.06 93.07 ∗∗∗ -55.47 9.56(75.49) (86.25) (75.83) (86.34) (73.27) (72.54) (39.17) (33.93) (2763.42) (4132.43)Pr.temp. (%) -.008 ∗ .002 -.006 .002 .02 ∗∗∗ -.01 ∗∗∗ .02 ∗∗∗ -.01 ∗∗∗ -.009 -.01(.005) (.005) (.005) (.005) (.004) (.004) (.004) (.003) (.13) (.18)SAU 1547.15 ∗∗∗ 1509.54 ∗∗∗ 1455.72 ∗∗∗ 1487.78 ∗∗∗ -686.35 ∗∗∗ 1243.54 ∗∗∗ -691.53 ∗∗∗ 1268.11 ∗∗∗ 1078.66 1363.89(83.11) (80.11) (90.83) (90.80) (162.19) (102.49) (122.58) (71.98) (1168.53) (861.83)Chargement -.09 .12 ∗∗∗ -.09 .11 ∗∗∗ -.20 ∗∗∗ .17 ∗∗∗ -.21 ∗∗∗ .18 ∗∗∗ -.17 -.004(.09) (.02) (.09) (.02) (.04) (.05) (.04) (.05) (.56) (.49)Chapitre 5. Les résultats obtenusNote : Les estimateurs sont décrits dans le tableau 3.1. Les écart-types apparaissent entre parenthèses. Les symboles ∗∗∗ (resp.∗∗, ∗) indiquent une significativité auseuil de 1% (resp. 5%, 10%).Source : Calculs <strong>des</strong> auteurs.
Change language