Beeldvorming van VROUWEN & MANNEN IN DE ... - igvm - Belgium

126
ded consequence of idealized advertising imagery’, Journal of advertising 39(2), pp. 17-28.
• Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, Neuwied: Luchterhand. (Vertaald in het
Engels als: Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a
category of bourgeois society, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.)
• Hall, C. en M. Crum (1994). ‘Women and “body-isms” in television beer commercials’, Sex roles
31(5-6), pp. 329-337.
• Harrison, K. en J. Cantor (1997). ‘The relationschip between media consumption and eating disorders’,
Journal of communication 47(1), pp. 40-68.
• Harrison, K. (2000). ‘The body electric: thin-ideal media and eating disorders in adolescents’,
Journal of communication 50(3), pp. 119-143.
• Heinberg, L. en J.K. Thompson (1992). ‘Social comparison: gender, target importance ratings, and
relation to body image disturbance’, Journal of social behavior and personality 7(2), pp. 335-344.
• Higgins, E.T. (1987). ‘Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect’, Psychological review
94(July), pp. 319-340.
• Hirschman, E.C. en C.J. Thompson (1997). ‘Why media matter: toward a richer understanding of
consumers’ relationship with advertising and mass media’, Journal of advertising 26(1), pp. 48-60.
• Hoebeke, S. (2008). Sexe et stéréotypes dans les médias, Paris: Harmattan.
• Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time, New York: Norton.
• Jagger, E. (1998). ‘Marketing the self, buying an other: dating in a post modern, consumer society’,
Sociology 32(4), pp. 785-814.
• Kang, M. (1997). ‘The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender
analysis revisited’, Sex roles 37(11-12), pp. 979-997.
• Kenrick, D.T. en S.E. Gutierres (1980). ‘Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness:
when beauty becomes a social problem’, Journal of personality and social psychology 38(January),
pp. 131-140.
• Kenrick, D.T., S.E. Gutierres en L.L. Goldberg (1989). ‘Influence of popular erotica on judgments of
strangers and mates’, Journal of experimental social psychology 25(March), pp. 159-167.
• Kilbourne, J. (1999). Can’t buy my love: deadly persuasion: why women and girls must fight the addictive
power of advertising, New York: Free press.
• Kimmel, M.S. (1990). ‘Introduction’, in: Idem (ed.), Men confront pornography, New York: Crown
Publishers.
• Kimmel, A.J. en E. Tissier-Desbordes (1999). ‘Males, masculinity and consumption: an exploratory
investigation’, European advances in consumer research 4, pp. 243-251.
• Kolbe, R.H. en P.J. Albanese (1997). ‘The functional integration of sole-male images into magazine
advertisements’, Sex roles 36(11-12), pp. 813-836.
• Krassas, N., J. Blauwkamp en P. Wesselink (2001). ‘Boxing Helena and corseting Eunice: sexual rhetoric
in Cosmopolitan and Playboy magazines’, Sex roles 44(11-12), pp. 751-771.
• Kruglanski, A.W. en O. Mayseless (1990). ‘Classic and current social comparison research’,
Psychological bulletin 108(2), pp. 195-208.
• Lakoff, R.T. en R.L. Scherr (1984). Face value: the politics of beauty, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Lasch, C. (1978). The culture of narcissism, New York: Norton.
• Lavine, H., D. Sweeney en S.H. Wagner (1999). ‘Depicting women as sex objects in television
advertising: effects on body dissatisfaction’, Personality and social psychology bulletin 25(8), pp.
1049-1058.
• Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: woman and the rise of raunch culture, New York: Free press.
(Vertaald als: Levy, A. (2007). Female chauvinist pigs. De opkomst van de bimbo-cultuur, Amsterdam:
Meulenhoff ).
• Lichtenstein, G. (1970). ‘Feminists demand “liberation” in Ladies Home Journal sit-in’, New York
Times (March 19), p. 51.
• Lovdal, L.T. (1989). ‘Sex role messages in television commercials: an update’, Sex roles 21(11-12),
pp. 715-724.
• Lysonski, S. (1983). ‘Female and male portrayals in magazine advertisements: a re-examination’,
Akron business review 14(Summer), pp. 45-50.
• Lyubomirsky, S. en L. Ross (1997). ‘Hedonic consequences of social comparison: a contrast of
happy and unhappy people’, Journal of personality and social psychology 73(6), pp. 1141-1157.