Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...
Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...
Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
oth as a cry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> revolt and as encouragement to face <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hardships. The manner in which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire<br />
cerem<strong>on</strong>y was c<strong>on</strong>ducted, in a synagogue full to capacity, implicitly represented an act <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> passive<br />
resistance. Even in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> days <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jewish Central and <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> harsh c<strong>on</strong>trol exercised by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ministry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Religi<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> synagogue remained a site for educating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> youth, a place for recollecti<strong>on</strong> and mutual<br />
support. In spite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> uncertainties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> everyday life, in spite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> severe c<strong>on</strong>straints and threats, Romanian<br />
Jews followed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir traditi<strong>on</strong>s, maybe with even with more fervor than in peaceful times.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />
The Jewish framework <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> instituti<strong>on</strong>s functi<strong>on</strong>ed al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lines <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> civil society organizati<strong>on</strong>s and was<br />
closely associated with Jewish daily life and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> material, moral, and spiritual fate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> discriminated<br />
minority. Even <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jewish Central—an instituti<strong>on</strong> directly subordinated to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state—was compelled by<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> circumstances <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those times to factor in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> interests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> formal and informal traditi<strong>on</strong>al Jewish<br />
instituti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
In more peaceful times, when Jews enjoyed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same rights as all o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Romanian citizens and were<br />
integrated into Romanian society—at least according to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al and democratic provisi<strong>on</strong>s—<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Jewish community’s instituti<strong>on</strong>s were generally c<strong>on</strong>fined to ethno-cultural and religious issues. When<br />
Jews lost many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> citizenship and became <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> object <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> statutory discriminati<strong>on</strong>, when <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y<br />
were deprived <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir property and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir jobs, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> community instituti<strong>on</strong>s were <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re to help manage <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
crisis and work <strong>on</strong> behalf <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> individual and collective survival through self-management, selfadministrati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
self-organizati<strong>on</strong>, and most important, mutual assistance in every life.<br />
THE DEPORTATION OF THE ROMA AND THEIR TREATMENT IN TRANSNISTRIA<br />
The Ant<strong>on</strong>escu Regime and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Emergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “Gypsy Problem”<br />
The deportati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma to Transnistria—from its idea to its implementati<strong>on</strong>—was altoge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
work <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ant<strong>on</strong>escu government. Before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ant<strong>on</strong>escu regime, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was no “Gypsy policy” to speak<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> in Romania. Politicians did not see <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma as a “problem.” Even though <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y were registered in<br />
censuses as a separate ethnic group with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir own language, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma were treated more as a social<br />
category. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir acti<strong>on</strong>s Romanian authorities never treated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma a nati<strong>on</strong>al minority<br />
per se; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore, legislati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerning minorities was never applicable to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m. Also, interwar<br />
Romanian nati<strong>on</strong>alism was not accompanied by anti-Roma manifestati<strong>on</strong>s and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanizati<strong>on</strong> policies<br />
promoted by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1938 Goga government and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Carol II m<strong>on</strong>archic authority regime did not pertain to<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma. The General Commissariat for Minorities (Comisariatul General al Minoritatilor), established<br />
in 1938, never c<strong>on</strong>sidered <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> scope <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “Jewish problem” figured largely in Romanian interwar politics, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was no “Gypsy problem”<br />
to speak <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Romanian political parties and politicians even developed collaborative relati<strong>on</strong>ships with<br />
Roma leaders, some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> whom became formal members <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian parties. During <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1937 electoral<br />
campaign, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tara Noastra journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al-Christian Party (Octavian Goga’s party) printed a<br />
special weekly for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma.<br />
The situati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> decades preceding <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> World War II is well known, mainly due to<br />
sociological and ethnographic research d<strong>on</strong>e in those years. The 1930 census recorded 262,501 people<br />
who declared <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves to be <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Gypsy descent (1.5 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romania’s populati<strong>on</strong>). Of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se,