27.02.2013 Views

Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...

Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...

Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oth as a cry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> revolt and as encouragement to face <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hardships. The manner in which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire<br />

cerem<strong>on</strong>y was c<strong>on</strong>ducted, in a synagogue full to capacity, implicitly represented an act <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> passive<br />

resistance. Even in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> days <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jewish Central and <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> harsh c<strong>on</strong>trol exercised by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ministry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Religi<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> synagogue remained a site for educating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> youth, a place for recollecti<strong>on</strong> and mutual<br />

support. In spite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> uncertainties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> everyday life, in spite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> severe c<strong>on</strong>straints and threats, Romanian<br />

Jews followed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir traditi<strong>on</strong>s, maybe with even with more fervor than in peaceful times.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

The Jewish framework <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> instituti<strong>on</strong>s functi<strong>on</strong>ed al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lines <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> civil society organizati<strong>on</strong>s and was<br />

closely associated with Jewish daily life and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> material, moral, and spiritual fate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> discriminated<br />

minority. Even <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jewish Central—an instituti<strong>on</strong> directly subordinated to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state—was compelled by<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> circumstances <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those times to factor in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> interests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> formal and informal traditi<strong>on</strong>al Jewish<br />

instituti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

In more peaceful times, when Jews enjoyed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same rights as all o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Romanian citizens and were<br />

integrated into Romanian society—at least according to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al and democratic provisi<strong>on</strong>s—<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Jewish community’s instituti<strong>on</strong>s were generally c<strong>on</strong>fined to ethno-cultural and religious issues. When<br />

Jews lost many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> citizenship and became <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> object <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> statutory discriminati<strong>on</strong>, when <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y<br />

were deprived <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir property and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir jobs, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> community instituti<strong>on</strong>s were <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re to help manage <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

crisis and work <strong>on</strong> behalf <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> individual and collective survival through self-management, selfadministrati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

self-organizati<strong>on</strong>, and most important, mutual assistance in every life.<br />

THE DEPORTATION OF THE ROMA AND THEIR TREATMENT IN TRANSNISTRIA<br />

The Ant<strong>on</strong>escu Regime and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Emergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “Gypsy Problem”<br />

The deportati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma to Transnistria—from its idea to its implementati<strong>on</strong>—was altoge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

work <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ant<strong>on</strong>escu government. Before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ant<strong>on</strong>escu regime, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was no “Gypsy policy” to speak<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> in Romania. Politicians did not see <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma as a “problem.” Even though <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y were registered in<br />

censuses as a separate ethnic group with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir own language, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma were treated more as a social<br />

category. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir acti<strong>on</strong>s Romanian authorities never treated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma a nati<strong>on</strong>al minority<br />

per se; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore, legislati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerning minorities was never applicable to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m. Also, interwar<br />

Romanian nati<strong>on</strong>alism was not accompanied by anti-Roma manifestati<strong>on</strong>s and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanizati<strong>on</strong> policies<br />

promoted by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1938 Goga government and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Carol II m<strong>on</strong>archic authority regime did not pertain to<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma. The General Commissariat for Minorities (Comisariatul General al Minoritatilor), established<br />

in 1938, never c<strong>on</strong>sidered <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> scope <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “Jewish problem” figured largely in Romanian interwar politics, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was no “Gypsy problem”<br />

to speak <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Romanian political parties and politicians even developed collaborative relati<strong>on</strong>ships with<br />

Roma leaders, some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> whom became formal members <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian parties. During <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1937 electoral<br />

campaign, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tara Noastra journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al-Christian Party (Octavian Goga’s party) printed a<br />

special weekly for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma.<br />

The situati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Roma in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> decades preceding <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> World War II is well known, mainly due to<br />

sociological and ethnographic research d<strong>on</strong>e in those years. The 1930 census recorded 262,501 people<br />

who declared <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves to be <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Gypsy descent (1.5 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romania’s populati<strong>on</strong>). Of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!