27.02.2013 Views

Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...

Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...

Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The fate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian Jews during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> brief term <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Legi<strong>on</strong>ary government depended <strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> developments in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> power struggles taking place within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong> as well as between Ant<strong>on</strong>escu<br />

and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong>. Various Nazi <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficials, including representatives at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> German embassy in Bucharest,<br />

German intelligence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficers, and members <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> German minority from Transylvania, indirectly<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributed to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian Jews through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir influence <strong>on</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>s between Ant<strong>on</strong>escu and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Legi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

As <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong> grew rich by taking possessi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> most Jewish property, Marshal Ant<strong>on</strong>escu and his<br />

supporters began to perceive <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong> as a threat. The Marshal agreed that Jews should lose <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir<br />

property, yet he did not agree with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> means and pace <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expropriati<strong>on</strong>. Nei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r did he agree with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact<br />

that an organizati<strong>on</strong> and individuals, ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian state and Romanian people, benefited from<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se acti<strong>on</strong>s. This c<strong>on</strong>flict dem<strong>on</strong>strates that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>tati<strong>on</strong> between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong> and Ant<strong>on</strong>escu was<br />

not a c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>tati<strong>on</strong> between a gross, violent antisemitism and a compassi<strong>on</strong>ate, humane attitude, or<br />

between a savage form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>alism and a form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> “opportunistic” antisemitism. Ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Legi<strong>on</strong>naires wanted everything, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y wanted it immediately; Ant<strong>on</strong>escu, while sharing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same<br />

goal, intended to achieve it gradually, using different methods. The Marshal stated this clearly in an<br />

address to Legi<strong>on</strong>-appointed ministers: “Do you really think that we can replace all Yids immediately?<br />

Government challenges are addressed <strong>on</strong>e by <strong>on</strong>e, like in a game <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> chess.” By early January 1941,<br />

Ant<strong>on</strong>escu was c<strong>on</strong>vinced that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong>’s acti<strong>on</strong>s no l<strong>on</strong>ger served <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> interests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>alism and that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong> had become an instrument <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> extorti<strong>on</strong> for its own members.<br />

On January 14, 1941, Ant<strong>on</strong>escu met Hitler in Obersalzberg and obtained agreement <strong>on</strong> his plan to do<br />

away with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong>. The days preceding <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong>naire rebelli<strong>on</strong> against Ant<strong>on</strong>escu and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pogrom<br />

that occurred simultaneously were marked by strikingly vehement antisemitic statements from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Legi<strong>on</strong>’s propaganda apparatus. The Legi<strong>on</strong>ary movement’s print media, while avowing its support <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Nazi Germany’s antisemitic policies with increasing frequency, indicated in detail what so<strong>on</strong> was to<br />

follow <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “day <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> reck<strong>on</strong>ing.” The rebelli<strong>on</strong> began when armed Legi<strong>on</strong>naires occupied <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bucharest<br />

Police headquarters, local police stati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bucharest City Hall, several ministries, and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r public<br />

buildings. When army soldiers attempted to regain c<strong>on</strong>trol <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se buildings, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong>naires opened<br />

fire <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m. Although Hitler had granted him a free hand, Ant<strong>on</strong>escu maneuvered cautiously in order to<br />

avoid irritating Nazi leadership in Berlin and to let <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong>naires compromise <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir<br />

own acti<strong>on</strong>s. This strategy included keeping <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> army <strong>on</strong> “active defensive.” Until <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> evening <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> January<br />

22, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> army’s acti<strong>on</strong>s were limited to returning fire when shot at first and to encircling sites c<strong>on</strong>trolled by<br />

Legi<strong>on</strong>naires. This allowed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ir<strong>on</strong> Guard to kill Jews and to pillage or burn <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir property unimpeded in<br />

several counties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bucharest. As a result, Jewish homes and businesses over several kilometers—<strong>on</strong><br />

Dudesti and Vacaresti streets—were severely damaged. The army <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fensive ended <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rebelli<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

morning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> January 24.<br />

At this point it was clear that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bucharest pogrom was part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a Legi<strong>on</strong>-drafted plan and not <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

manifestati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a sp<strong>on</strong>taneous outburst or <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> strategic exploitati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a moment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> anarchy. The pogrom<br />

was not a development isolated from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> terrorist atmosphere and policy typical <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Legi<strong>on</strong>ary<br />

state, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> climax <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> progressi<strong>on</strong>. The army did not take part in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bucharest pogrom. The<br />

perpetrators came from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ranks <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> organizati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>trolled by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong>: Legi<strong>on</strong> members and<br />

members <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> terrorist organizati<strong>on</strong>s, police from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ministry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Interior and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sigurantza, and Bucharest<br />

Prefectura pers<strong>on</strong>nel. Many ordinary civilians also participated.<br />

The Minister <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Interior ordered <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> burning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jewish districts <strong>on</strong> January 22, 1941; this signaled <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

beginning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pogrom. Yet, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> attack <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two Jewish districts as well as <strong>on</strong> neighboring districts<br />

inhabited by Jews had, in effect, been launched at no<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> day before. Moreover, by January 20, 1941,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Legi<strong>on</strong> had already started to launch mass arrests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jews and taking those apprehended to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!