Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...
Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...
Final Report of the International Commission on the - Minority Rights ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
territory without a fight disoriented both <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficers and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rank-and-file soldiers who, although aware<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir inferiority in numbers and war materiel, had resolved to resist at any price <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Soviet army, whom<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y looked down <strong>on</strong> as badly trained.”<br />
Attitudes and Acti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jews during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Evacuati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bessarabia, Nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn Bukovina and<br />
County <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Herţa<br />
One <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dominant clichés in Romanian historiography about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> June 28-July 3, 1940,<br />
was that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jews in Bessarabia and Nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn Bukovina behaved disloyally toward <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> retreating<br />
Romanian troops and civilian administrati<strong>on</strong>. This belief, though false, was used to justify subsequent<br />
anti-Jewish Romanian acti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
The Situati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jews <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romania, 1919-1940<br />
On December 9, 1919, within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> framework <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Versailles Treaty, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian government,<br />
toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with France, England, Italy and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> United States, signed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Treaty <strong>on</strong> Ethnic Minorities. This<br />
agreement obliged Romania to grant citizenship to all ethnic Austrians and Hungarians born in former<br />
Hapsburg lands that became part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romania in 1918 (Transylvania and Bukovina). The same document<br />
granted citizenship to all Jews who <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n lived in Romania and who did not hold o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r citizenship. These<br />
obligati<strong>on</strong>s were subsequently codified in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> new Romanian C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> (1923), which prohibited<br />
discriminati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> religi<strong>on</strong>, religious denominati<strong>on</strong>, ethnic origins or language (articles 7 and 8) . A<br />
new law was passed <strong>on</strong> February 25, 1924, to extend citizenship to former citizens <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hapsburg and<br />
Russian empires who resided in Transylvania, Banat, Crişana and Maramureş; it was extended to those in<br />
Bessarabia between March 27 and April 9, 1918, and to those in Bukovina <strong>on</strong> November 28, 1918. This<br />
legislati<strong>on</strong> was in force for nearly a decade and a half. During this time, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jewish populati<strong>on</strong><br />
participated freely in all domains <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian life.<br />
At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same time, however, antisemitic currents became bolder. Their political manifestati<strong>on</strong>s were<br />
(1) <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Christian Defense League (NCDL), led by A.C. Cuza (PROVIDE YEARS) and (2) <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Ir<strong>on</strong> Guard (also called The Legi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Archangel Michael). (2) PROVIDE YEARS Running under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
name “Totul pentru Tara” (Everything for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rland), <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> outlawed Ir<strong>on</strong> Guard w<strong>on</strong> 15.53 percent<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> votes in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1937 electi<strong>on</strong>s and was ranked third <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> political scene. Yet, n<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parties w<strong>on</strong><br />
more than 40 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> votes (<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> minimum required by Romanian law), and King Carol II used <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
opportunity to establish a pers<strong>on</strong>al dictatorship by appointing an outside party, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Christian<br />
Party (NCP), to form <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government. The NCP was established in 1935 through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> merger <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cuza’s<br />
NCDL and nati<strong>on</strong>alist Octavian Goga’s Nati<strong>on</strong>al Agrarian Party. This government was led by Octavian<br />
Goga lasted forty-four days.<br />
The Goga government instituted <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romania’s first <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficial antisemitic measures. On January 21,<br />
1938, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Goga government issued State Decree no. 169 <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Revisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Citizenship, which required<br />
Jews to register documents proving <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y had not settled in Romania between 1918 and 1924 within<br />
twenty days <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> publicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> “nati<strong>on</strong>ality logs” by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> local municipalities. Even though in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Old<br />
Regat this deadline was extended, it never<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>less proved to be far too brief for all Jews to register or find<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> required papers. In additi<strong>on</strong>, Romanian civil servants entrusted with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> procedures committed many<br />
abuses. As a c<strong>on</strong>sequence, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 617,396 Jews whose citizenship status was “reviewed” (84 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
728,115 Romanian Jews), 225,222 lost <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir citizenship and were c<strong>on</strong>sidered foreign residents. They were<br />
able to remain in Romania with renewable <strong>on</strong>e-year permits. A prelude to advancing foreign and<br />
domestic antisemitism, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> citizenship review severely affected <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> situati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian Jews and<br />
foretold a successi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> antisemitic measures that would lead to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tragedy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Romanian Jewry.