05.04.2013 Views

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14:l-12 GENESIS<br />

Eshcol, and Mamre, may have contributed much the larger<br />

portion of the victorious army.” (Leupold translates this,<br />

“these were bound by covenant to Abram.” This would<br />

indicate an agreement that guaranteed a close relationship.)<br />

These facts seems to be indicated in vv. 23-24: it is difficult<br />

to see how intelligent men could have ignored them.<br />

But again we are told that “nowhere else in the tradition<br />

is Abraham represented as living in such state;” that “in<br />

ch. 23, for instance, he is a lone stranger among the Hittite<br />

inhabitants of Kiriath-arba.” The fact remains, however,<br />

that when Abram left the East, he was accompanied by “all<br />

the souls they had gotten in Haran” (12:T). This refers<br />

to all the bondservants he had gotten during his stay there.<br />

Where there is a large stock of cattle, there must be an<br />

adequate number of servants to attend them. Abraham<br />

and Lot entered Canaan as men of considerable substance.<br />

Moreover, Gen. 12:16 and 13:2 indicate that they came<br />

out of Egypt with a much greater retinue. (Cf. also 18:19<br />

and 24:1). The argument that Abram was a “lone<br />

stranger” among the Hittites of Kiriath-arba is an argument<br />

from silence and does not harmonize with the tenor of the<br />

entire story of his first ventures in Canaan. Critics rely<br />

too much on assumption (or presumptions) to validate<br />

their. views, assumptions which, obviously are not Scripturally<br />

.justified: a fault stemming apparently from their<br />

innate (or academically generated) “inability to see the<br />

forest for the trees.”<br />

(3) “The representation that the Dead Sea was not yet<br />

in existence (cf. 13:lO) .” It is admitted that the words in<br />

v. 3, that is, the Salt Sea, may be a gloss and so may not<br />

reflect accurately the thought of the original writer”<br />

(S-ee IBG,‘ S90) . But recent archaeological evidence supports<br />

the use of chis name,a.s an integral part of the original<br />

narrative; The Salt.. Sea is> the name by which the Dead Sea<br />

is commonly designated in the Pentateuch and in the book<br />

of Joshua (Num. 34:3, Deut. 3:17; Josh. 3:16, 15:2, 5).<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!