05.04.2013 Views

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOJOURN IN THE NEGEB 20:1-21:34<br />

over the mother of the child of the covenant”; hence this<br />

verse is the complement essential to explaining v, 17. Other<br />

authorities explain that in v. 3, we have Elohivz without<br />

the article, that is, Deity generally; but Rbimelech recog-<br />

nizes the Lord, Adonai, i.e., God (v. 4); whereupon the<br />

historian represents Him as Elobim with the article, that<br />

is, the personal and true God, as speaking to him (Delitzsch,<br />

BCOTP, 240). Cf, Green (UBG, 2jl, 212) : “The critics<br />

have mistaken the lofty style used in describing grand<br />

creative acts or the vocabulary employed in setting forth<br />

the universal catastrophe of the deluge for the fixed habit<br />

of an Elohist writer, and set it over against the graceful<br />

style of the ordinary narrative in the early Jehovist sections.<br />

But in this chapter and in the rest of <strong>Genesis</strong>, whenever<br />

Elohim occurs in narrative sections, the stately periods of<br />

the account of the creation and the vocabulary of the<br />

creation and the flood are dropped, and terms appropriate<br />

to the common affairs of life and the ordinary course of<br />

human events are employed by the Elohist precisely as<br />

they are by the Jehovist. Elohim occurs throughout this<br />

chapter (vs. 3, 6, 11, 12, 17), except in the last verse<br />

(v. 18) where Jehovah is used. But the words and phrases<br />

are those which are held to be characteristic of the Je-<br />

hovist.” Thus do the critics nullify their own “assured<br />

results.”<br />

Again, the question is raised by the critics, Why the<br />

specific’ inclusion of the elaboration by Abraham as re-<br />

gards his motivation in dealing with Abirnelech, as dis-<br />

tinguished from the narrative of his dealing with Pharaoh?<br />

That is to say, is there a reason for the explanation to<br />

Abimelech that his wife was in reality a half-sister in view<br />

of the fact that no such explanation was vouchsafed‘the<br />

king of Egypt? Obviously, there is a reason for this<br />

difference. Again, note Green (UBG, 257, n.) : ::Abraham<br />

says of his wife at the outset, ‘She is my sister’ (v. 2). ; In<br />

and of itself this is quite intelligible; and a Hebrew narrator<br />

3 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!