05.04.2013 Views

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE GENERATIONS OF TERAH ,1 I: 27-3 2<br />

,assumption prevails ghat Israel must in all respects be like<br />

,other nations. If other nations had tales from their early<br />

history which were purely legendary, so must Israel’s record<br />

be, Aside from being a begging of the principle, critics of<br />

this stripe are ready to concede Israel’s distinct superiority<br />

in the :matter of .religion. Why cannot the rest of the<br />

life of this people furnish material superior to that found<br />

in other nations,<br />

“One of the most popular methods of dealing with<br />

patriarchal history is to approach it on the basis of the<br />

so-called tribal theory (Stamw%eorie) , This theory<br />

assumes that the patriarchs were not actual historical<br />

characters but fictitious characters which are to serve to<br />

explain the origin of certain tribes. When Abram goes to<br />

Egypt, the tribe in reality went in its earlier days, etc. The<br />

patriarchs are eponymous characters to whom is ascribed<br />

what befell the tribe. The grain of truth involved in this<br />

theory is that, in reality, certain of the names mentioned<br />

in the Table of Nations, chapter ten, are tribal names and<br />

not names of persons. However, in such cases (10: 13, 14,<br />

16, 17, 18) tribal names are used (“Amorite, Girgashite,”<br />

etc.), and no attempt is made to make them appear as<br />

individuals. The claim by which the tribal theory is<br />

chiefly supported is that ethnology has no instances on<br />

record where nations descended from an individual, as, for<br />

example, Israel from Abram. However, on this score the<br />

Biblical records happen to have preserved facts which<br />

ethnology no longer has available. But how a nation may<br />

descend from an individual is traced s’tep by step in the<br />

Biblical record.<br />

“Besides, the <strong>Genesis</strong> records in their detailed accounts<br />

bear too much of the stamp of records concerning charac-<br />

ters of flesh and blood as we have it. Dillmann may make<br />

light of this fact and say: ‘We need nowadays no longer<br />

prove that the wealth of picturesque details of the narra-<br />

tive is not in itself a proof of the historicity of the things<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!