05.04.2013 Views

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOJOURN IN THE NEGEB 20:1-21:34<br />

ian country of the Biblical records meant a rather wild<br />

region of scant vegetation, except at certain seasons when<br />

rainfall provided temporary pasturage for the nomads’<br />

flocks (cf. Psa. 106~9, A,R,V,, marginal rendering, pasture-<br />

Zartd) . These wildernesses, unlike densely wooded wildernesses<br />

of our Americas, were treeless, except for palm-trees<br />

in the oases, bushes like acacia, and inferior trees like the<br />

tamarisk (Exo. 15:27, Elim; Gen. 21:33). Because of its<br />

aridity a wilderness in Scripture is sometimes called a<br />

desert.)<br />

(3) Gerar, aiid the Philistines.<br />

Whatever the extent<br />

to which Abraham pastured his flocks between Kadesh and<br />

Shur, his more or less permanent tenting-ground must<br />

have been in the vicinity of Gerar, a city forty miles<br />

sautheast of Gaza in the foothills of the Judean mountains<br />

(Gen. 1O:19), hence interior to the coastal plain, and<br />

some distance from the route over which (by way of<br />

Gaza) invading armies invariably have moved to and fro<br />

between Egypt and Southwest Asia not only in ancient<br />

times, but even in our own century. (It should be noted<br />

that Armageddon lies on this military route, Rev. 16:16.<br />

See under “Megiddo” in any Bible Dictionary). Both<br />

Abraham and Isaac sojourned at Gerar (Gen., chs. 20, 21,<br />

26), digging wells for their flocks. The city, we are told,<br />

was situated in the “land of the Philistines’’ (Gen. 21:32,<br />

34; 26:1, 8). This designation is said to be an anachronism:<br />

“it could be ascribed to a late editor, for the Philistines<br />

probably entered the land long after the time of Abraham”<br />

(HSB, 3 1). Archaeological evidence,, however, proves that<br />

this is not necessarily so. Cf. Schultz (OTS, 35) : “The<br />

presence of the Philistines in Canaan during patriarchal<br />

times has been considered an anachronism. The Caphtorian<br />

settlement in Canaan around 1200 B.C. represented<br />

a late migration of the Sea People who had made previous<br />

settlements over a long period of time. The Philistines<br />

had thus established themselves in smaller numbers long<br />

3 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!