05.04.2013 Views

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

17:1-27 GENESIS<br />

regarded as queer. That is why it is not easy for every<br />

modern reader, who is not familiar with the ancient back-<br />

ground and literatures, to understand that aspect of He-<br />

brew society. For the ancient Hebrews, the human and<br />

divine intermingled freely. The early direct relationship<br />

between men and gods is common to all the epics: Ugarit,<br />

Mesopotamian, Greek and proto-patriarchal. This simple<br />

personal contact between men and God was gradually<br />

eliminated.” Again: “A charming tradition illustrates how<br />

Abraham, on intimate terms with the Lord, dared to inter-<br />

cede with him, in the famous dialogue over the problem<br />

of the wicked people of Sodom and its few, hypothetical<br />

righteous men.” (Cf. Moises and God, Exo. 19:7-15 ; Num.<br />

11:lO-23, 14:ll-35). But, note Lange’s comment<br />

(CDHCG, 424) : “That the interpreter . , . knows nothing<br />

of a laugh of astonishment, in connection with full faith,<br />

indeed, in the immediate experience of the events (Psa.<br />

126:l-2) is evident. . . . We may confidently infer from<br />

the different judgments of Abraham’s laughter here, and<br />

that of Sarah, which is recorded afterward, that there was<br />

an important distinction in the states of mind from which<br />

they sprang. The characteristic feature in the narration<br />

here is, that Abraham fell upon his face, as at first, after<br />

the promise, v. 2.” “The laughter of Abraham was the<br />

exultation of joy, not the smile of unbelief” (Augustine,<br />

De Ciw. Dei, 16, 26). Certainly the laughter of Sarah<br />

later (18:lZ-lj) was one of incredulity, but the concept<br />

of Abraham in a derisive attitude toward God is not in<br />

keeping with the patriarch’s character. Murphy (MG,<br />

311) : “From the reverential attitude assumed by Abra-<br />

ham we infer that his laughter sprang from joyful and<br />

grateful surprise. Said in his heurt. The following ques-<br />

tions of wonder are not addressed to God; they merely<br />

agitate the breast of the astonished patriarch. Hence his<br />

irrepressible smile arises not from any doubt of the fulfill-<br />

ment of the promise, but from surprise at the unexpected<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!