05.04.2013 Views

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

Genesis Vol 3.pdf - College Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE GENERATIONS OF TERAH 11 :27-32<br />

an undetermined number of unidentified and unidentifiable<br />

“redactors’) to provide a solution for these problems. The<br />

problems themselves are relatively trivial, of the kind that<br />

usually attach to documents of historical interest extend-<br />

ing into the ancient past. Cornfeld (AtD, 49) comments<br />

on this problem interestingly, as follows: “Hebrew tradi-<br />

tion does not ascribe a written record to Abraham but to<br />

Moses (we use the term ‘tradition’ in the sense of ‘what<br />

was handed down’). It is fairly certain that the patriarchal<br />

narratives, for the most part, derive from oral traditions,<br />

many of which were written after the time of Moses. But<br />

such oral traditions of pre-literary times are not to be<br />

spurned. The reliability of transmission was assured by<br />

the incredible memories of the Orientals. Hermann Gunkel<br />

remarks that these traditions in <strong>Genesis</strong> break up into<br />

separate tales, each unit characterized by a few participants<br />

and the affairs of a few families, simple descriptions, laconic<br />

speech, all welded into big bold strokes of narration with<br />

artful use of suspense. This colorful and memorable mode<br />

of narration is a vehicle for family and tribal traditions<br />

especially suited to oral transmission. The extraordinary<br />

feature is that Hebrew memory had preserved such pre-<br />

literary traditions for more than a thousand years and set<br />

them down in writing so faithfully.’’ (It will be noted<br />

that any special inspiration of the Spirit of God in the<br />

preservation and presentation of these “traditions” in the<br />

Old Testament Scriptures, is carefully ignored in the fore-<br />

going statements, even though repeatedly affirmed for<br />

these Scriptures by the Bible writers themselves; cf. 1 Pet.<br />

1:lO-12, 2 Pet. 1:21, 2 Sam. 23:2, Acts 3:22-25). The<br />

whole Documentary Theory of the Pentateuch rests upon<br />

the basic assumption that the cultural background disclosed<br />

in the Biblical accounts of the Patriarchal Age reflect a<br />

milieu that would be appropriate only to a much later<br />

period, probably as much later as that of the Exile: as<br />

Wellhausen himself puts it: “We attain to no historical<br />

27<br />

. /

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!