24.04.2013 Views

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> evidence from the texts cited demonstrates that animals, when featured as<br />

subjects <strong>of</strong> works <strong>of</strong> art, were <strong>in</strong>timately connected with the concept <strong>of</strong> lifelikeness. In<br />

fact, animals provide the ancient def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> this concept as accurate reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />

physical form <strong>and</strong> a sense <strong>of</strong> aliveness which allowed the viewer to cross freely the<br />

boundary between art <strong>and</strong> reality <strong>and</strong> created the impression that the animal subject had<br />

the ability to speak <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> some cases even move. In light <strong>of</strong> this evidence, animals<br />

provide a useful <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the ancient Greek underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the lifelikeness <strong>of</strong> works<br />

<strong>of</strong> art. This exceptional role <strong>of</strong> animals <strong>in</strong> the realm <strong>of</strong> artistic lifelikeness <strong>in</strong> ancient<br />

<strong>Greece</strong> is also found <strong>in</strong> their featur<strong>in</strong>g as judges <strong>of</strong> lifelike works <strong>of</strong> art.<br />

<strong><strong>Animal</strong>s</strong> as Judges <strong>of</strong> Lifelikeness <strong>of</strong> Works <strong>of</strong> Art<br />

<strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> animals—a part <strong>of</strong> the natural world—as judges <strong>of</strong> lifelike works <strong>of</strong><br />

art is <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> a very particular approach to art itself: as an artificial man-made<br />

construction, but, at the same time, one accepted as natural even by nature itself. <strong>The</strong><br />

most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> most familiar attestation to animals as judges <strong>of</strong> artistic lifelikeness<br />

occurs <strong>in</strong> Pl<strong>in</strong>y’s account <strong>of</strong> a competition between two fourth-century pa<strong>in</strong>ters, Zeuxis<br />

<strong>and</strong> Parrhasius:<br />

His [Zeuxis’] contemporaries <strong>and</strong> rivals were Timanthes, Androcydes, Eupompus<br />

<strong>and</strong> Parrhasius. This last it, is recorded, entered <strong>in</strong>to a competition with Zeuxis,<br />

who produced a picture <strong>of</strong> grapes so successfully represented that birds flew up to<br />

the stage-build<strong>in</strong>gs; whereupon Parrhasius himself produced such a realistic<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> a curta<strong>in</strong> that Zeuxis, proud <strong>of</strong> the verdict <strong>of</strong> the birds, requested that<br />

the curta<strong>in</strong> should now be drawn <strong>and</strong> the picture displayed; <strong>and</strong> when he realized<br />

his mistake, with a modesty that did him honor he yielded up the prize, say<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that whereas he had deceived birds Parrhasius had deceived him, an artist. It is<br />

said that Zeuxis also subsequently pa<strong>in</strong>ted a Child Carry<strong>in</strong>g Grapes, <strong>and</strong> when<br />

birds flew to the fruit with the same frankness as before he strode up to the picture<br />

<strong>in</strong> anger with it <strong>and</strong> said, “I have pa<strong>in</strong>ted the grapes better than the child, as if I<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!