24.04.2013 Views

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

form <strong>of</strong> equ<strong>in</strong>e connoisseurship responsive to the dignity <strong>of</strong> the artist’s identity as well as<br />

his skill.” 136 Additional evidence po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to the same direction derives also from Pl<strong>in</strong>y’s<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> the employment <strong>of</strong> animals as “a sound test <strong>in</strong> artistic skill,” which<br />

speaks not only <strong>of</strong> the trust placed upon animals as good judges <strong>of</strong> lifelikeness <strong>in</strong> art, but<br />

also <strong>of</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> lifelikeness as an exceptional skill <strong>of</strong> artists. That Apelles was one<br />

<strong>of</strong> these artists is also evidenced <strong>in</strong> another passage <strong>of</strong> Pl<strong>in</strong>y which presents him as the<br />

creator <strong>of</strong> exceptionally lifelike images, <strong>in</strong> this case <strong>of</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs. 137<br />

Both stories recorded by Pl<strong>in</strong>y <strong>in</strong>dicate that non-human animals such as birds <strong>and</strong><br />

horses were considered reliable guides even to extreme cases <strong>of</strong> lifelikeness <strong>in</strong> works <strong>of</strong><br />

art <strong>in</strong> <strong>Classical</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>. Furthermore, the fact that animals, as part <strong>of</strong> the natural world,<br />

consider works <strong>of</strong> art to be so lifelike suggests a specific attitude toward art itself: that it<br />

has surpassed its own essence as a man-made creation <strong>and</strong> is now accepted as nature even<br />

by nature itself.<br />

<strong>The</strong> literary sources exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this essay <strong>in</strong>dicate that animals played a<br />

significant role <strong>in</strong> the perception <strong>of</strong> lifelikeness <strong>in</strong> ancient Greek art. <strong><strong>Animal</strong>s</strong> featured<br />

not only as subjects <strong>of</strong> works <strong>of</strong> art valued for their lifelikeness, which <strong>in</strong> some cases was<br />

perceived as exceptional, but they were also considered a reliable st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> judg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

equally exceptional lifelike art. This double capacity <strong>of</strong> animals <strong>in</strong> the realm <strong>of</strong><br />

136 Mitchell, “Illusion” 336-337.<br />

137 “He [Apelles] also pa<strong>in</strong>ted portraits so absolutely lifelike that, <strong>in</strong>credible, as it sounds, the grammarian<br />

Apio has left it on record that one <strong>of</strong> those persons called ‘physiognomists,’ who prophesy people’s future<br />

by their countenance, pronounced from their portraits either the year <strong>of</strong> the subjects’ deaths hereafter or the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> years they had already lived” (Pl<strong>in</strong>y, NH 35.88-35.89); translation: H. Rackham, ed., tr., Pl<strong>in</strong>y.<br />

Natural History IX. Books XXXIII-XXXV (Cambridge, Mass. <strong>and</strong> London, 1952; repr. 1995) 327. For the<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> Apelles as the most accomplished pa<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> lifelike images <strong>in</strong> antiquity, <strong>and</strong> its <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />

Renaissance artists, who saw Apelles as a model <strong>of</strong> an artist to be imitated, see D. Cast, <strong>The</strong> Calumny <strong>of</strong><br />

Apelles. A Study <strong>in</strong> the Humanist Tradition (New Haven <strong>and</strong> London, 1981) 161-173.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!