24.04.2013 Views

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Herodotus provides further <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> zw|~on. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to him,<br />

the <strong>in</strong>scription that accompanied the zw|~on <strong>of</strong> a man on horseback set up by Darius read<br />

as follow<strong>in</strong>g: “Darius, son <strong>of</strong> Hystaspes, with the help <strong>of</strong> his horse’s excellence (he there<br />

mentioned the stallion’s name) “<strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> Oebares the groom, won the k<strong>in</strong>gship <strong>of</strong><br />

Persia.” <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>scription first implies that the image <strong>of</strong> the rider was a representation <strong>of</strong><br />

Darius or at least one that had some connection to him. Second, when seen <strong>in</strong> the<br />

immediate context <strong>of</strong> the Histories, the <strong>in</strong>scription emerges as a succ<strong>in</strong>ct, shorter version<br />

<strong>of</strong> the story narrated <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g sections (3.84-3.87), <strong>in</strong> which Herodotus expla<strong>in</strong>s<br />

that the groom Oebares, who rigged a horse race, was <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

royal power <strong>of</strong> Darius. This evidence suggests that Herodotus perceived zw|~on, the man<br />

on horseback represented on the work <strong>of</strong> sculpture set up by Darius as be<strong>in</strong>g directly<br />

<strong>in</strong>spired by a contemporary historical event, or, to put it simply, taken from real life.<br />

<strong>The</strong> authenticity <strong>of</strong> both the image <strong>of</strong> the rider <strong>and</strong> the story <strong>of</strong> the trick has,<br />

however, been repeatedly doubted. <strong>The</strong> doubt arose because <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> the rider<br />

<strong>in</strong> monumental Achaemenid art. Thus, How <strong>and</strong> Wells, <strong>and</strong> also De Sél<strong>in</strong>court <strong>and</strong><br />

Mar<strong>in</strong>cola state firmly that Achaemenid monumental art supplies no evidence that<br />

matches Herodotus’ account. 476 In agreement with them is Stephanie West, who remarks<br />

that “the extant rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Achaemenid monumental art provide no parallel for the work<br />

here described, though the material at our disposal is not so abundant that an argument<br />

from silence may be regarded as conclusive.” 477 Margaret Root does not take this lack <strong>of</strong><br />

476 How <strong>and</strong> Wells, A Commentary on Herodotus 280: “neither at Behistun nor on his tomb at Nakhsh-I-<br />

Rustam is Darius represented on horseback. But Herodotus may well have seen some ‘relief,’ now<br />

destroyed, resembl<strong>in</strong>g the façade <strong>of</strong> Tagh-I-Bostan”; De Sél<strong>in</strong>court <strong>and</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>cola, Herodotus. <strong>The</strong><br />

Histories 648, n. 30: “no monument <strong>of</strong> this sort has been discovered, nor should we expect that it will,<br />

given the portrait <strong>of</strong> Darius’ rise to power <strong>in</strong> the Behistun <strong>in</strong>scription.”<br />

477 S. West, “Herodotus’ Epigraphical Interests,” CQ 35 (1985) 297.<br />

259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!