The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...
The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...
The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Aristophanes’s <strong>in</strong>tention to control the attention <strong>of</strong> his audience <strong>in</strong> regard to Carion<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s strong. 233 This evidence notwithst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, it is the preconceived supremacy <strong>of</strong><br />
the human residents <strong>of</strong> Chremylus’s house over the dog that appears to have determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
the way both these fictional characters <strong>and</strong> the audience they addressed related to the<br />
animal.<br />
Further evidence <strong>of</strong> the anthropocentric attitude that characterized the <strong>Classical</strong><br />
Greek relationship between humans <strong>and</strong> the dog is seen <strong>in</strong> philosophical writ<strong>in</strong>gs. In<br />
translation: S. B. Pomeroy, Xenophon. Oeconomicus. A Social <strong>and</strong> Historical Commentary (Oxford, 1994)<br />
67. Bradley, “<strong>Animal</strong>iz<strong>in</strong>g the Slave” 110, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that this notion <strong>of</strong> assimilation is further susta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
the fact that one <strong>of</strong> the ancient Greek words for slaves was a)ndra&podon mean<strong>in</strong>g a “man-footed th<strong>in</strong>g”<br />
analogous to tetra&podon “four-footed th<strong>in</strong>g.” For further discussion <strong>of</strong> these terms, see P. Cartledge, <strong>The</strong><br />
Greeks: A Portrait <strong>of</strong> Self <strong>and</strong> Others (Oxford <strong>and</strong> New York, 1993; second ed., 2002) 151, who clarifies<br />
that a)ndra&podon appears to have been the technical term for those slaves acquired through capture <strong>in</strong> war.<br />
Additional evidence that slaves <strong>and</strong> animals were closely associated <strong>in</strong> <strong>Classical</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> derives from the<br />
epigraphic record. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions record<strong>in</strong>g the sale <strong>of</strong> personal property confiscated from Alcibiades <strong>and</strong><br />
those Athenians who were accused <strong>of</strong> mutilat<strong>in</strong>g the Herms <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>an<strong>in</strong>g the Eleus<strong>in</strong>ian mysteries (415/4<br />
B.C.) show that both slaves <strong>and</strong> animals were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this property. For a discussion <strong>of</strong> the slaves sold,<br />
their names (e.g., Pistos) <strong>and</strong> their prices (e.g., 202 drachmai), see W. K. Pritchett, “<strong>The</strong> Attic Stelai, Part<br />
I,” Hesperia 22 (1953) 246; for the animals referred <strong>in</strong> these <strong>in</strong>scriptions, that is, oxen, goats, sheep, cows,<br />
<strong>and</strong> beehives, see W. K. Pritchett, “<strong>The</strong> Attic Stelai, Part II,” Hesperia 25 (1956) 255-261. <strong>The</strong> treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> animals as property on the <strong>in</strong>scriptions recalls the similarity with the current status <strong>of</strong> animals with<strong>in</strong><br />
human society. F<strong>in</strong>ally, for the ability to speak as the only criterion that differentiated slaves from animals<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>Classical</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>, see J. Heath, <strong>The</strong> Talk<strong>in</strong>g Greeks. Speech, <strong><strong>Animal</strong>s</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Other <strong>in</strong> Homer, Aeschylus,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Plato (Cambridge, 2005) 203, n. 113. For evidence that the same idea prevailed also <strong>in</strong> Roman society,<br />
see Gilhus, <strong><strong>Animal</strong>s</strong>, Gods <strong>and</strong> Humans 14.<br />
233 As Small, “Time <strong>in</strong> Space” 565, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s: “both the classical literary <strong>and</strong> visual examples can order<br />
their words <strong>and</strong> figures <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> different ways to achieve particular effects.” That this may be<br />
Aristophanes’ <strong>in</strong>tention is also supported by the fact that the reference to Carion at this po<strong>in</strong>t seems<br />
redundant, s<strong>in</strong>ce Hermes has already referred to the servants <strong>of</strong> the house. For the exceptional abilities <strong>of</strong><br />
Aristophanes to control <strong>and</strong> direct the attention <strong>of</strong> his audience, see N. W. Slater, “Mak<strong>in</strong>g the Aristophanic<br />
Audience,” AJP 120 (1999) 351-368. Given the overall portrayal <strong>of</strong> Carion <strong>in</strong> the play as an unusually<br />
outspoken <strong>and</strong> proud slave, <strong>and</strong> the fact that <strong>in</strong> both ancient Greek art <strong>and</strong> language the center is the most<br />
important position, it may be suggested that, when placed <strong>in</strong> the center <strong>of</strong> an arrangement that is bordered<br />
by a dog <strong>and</strong> a pig, Carion is associated, but not demoted to the level <strong>of</strong> these animals. On the contrary, he<br />
is dist<strong>in</strong>guished from them, who are presented here as the ends next <strong>in</strong> importance to the center. With<strong>in</strong><br />
this context, Carion’s position can be also seen as a trick that Aristophanes employs <strong>in</strong> order to store <strong>in</strong> his<br />
audience’s m<strong>in</strong>d the non-stereotypical behavior <strong>of</strong> this slave. For the perception <strong>of</strong> order <strong>and</strong> physical<br />
context as mnemonic devices, see J. P. Small, Wax Tablets <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>d. Cognitive Studies <strong>of</strong> Memory <strong>and</strong><br />
Literacy <strong>in</strong> <strong>Classical</strong> Antiquity (London <strong>and</strong> New York, 1997) esp. 84-85 <strong>and</strong> 227-230.<br />
For the exceptional character <strong>of</strong> Carion, see Olson, “Cario <strong>and</strong> the New World” 193-199. For a discussion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> the center <strong>in</strong> ancient Greek art <strong>and</strong> language, see Small, “Time <strong>in</strong> Space” 564-565,<br />
where references are made to specific artistic examples, such as the Parthenon frieze, <strong>and</strong> also to the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> the fact that Greek is an <strong>in</strong>flected language, a characteristic that allows the order <strong>of</strong> words to<br />
reflect the importance <strong>of</strong> each word.<br />
156