24.04.2013 Views

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Although it does not specify their size, evidence that Molossian dogs were highly<br />

valued as early as the sixth century B.C. comes from a passage from Athenaeus’<br />

Deipnosophists. <strong>The</strong> author cites two late fourth-century authors, Clytus, a disciple <strong>of</strong><br />

Aristotle, <strong>and</strong> Alexis, a comic poet, who count Molossian dogs among the most special<br />

animals collected by Polycrates, the tyrant <strong>of</strong> Samos (ca. 538-522 B.C.):<br />

Clytus the Aristotelian, <strong>in</strong> his work On Miletus, says <strong>of</strong> Polycrates the tyrant <strong>of</strong><br />

Samos that his <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ct for luxury moved him to get together the special products<br />

<strong>of</strong> every country—hounds from Epeirus, goats from Scyros, sheep from Miletus,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sw<strong>in</strong>e from Sicily. Alexis, too, <strong>in</strong> the third book <strong>of</strong> Samian Chronicles says<br />

that Samos was enriched by Polycrates with the products <strong>of</strong> many cities: he<br />

imported Molossian <strong>and</strong> Laconian hounds, goats from Scyros <strong>and</strong> Naxos, <strong>and</strong><br />

sheep from Miletus <strong>and</strong> Attica. (Deipn. 12.540c-12.540d) [76]<br />

Both fragments <strong>in</strong>dicate that Molossian dogs were already known as the special animals<br />

<strong>of</strong> Epeirus <strong>in</strong> the late sixth century B.C. By attest<strong>in</strong>g that Polycrates <strong>in</strong>cluded them<br />

among his luxurious possessions, 260 the fragments also suggest that the exceptional social<br />

status that Molossian dogs signified <strong>in</strong> pre-<strong>Classical</strong> times was still relevant as a topic,<br />

<strong>and</strong> therefore, <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> fourth-century authors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> literary evidence cited so far <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>in</strong> <strong>Classical</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> the<br />

relationship between humans <strong>and</strong> the dog was governed by an anthropocentric attitude.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dog lived together with humans <strong>in</strong> the same domestic sett<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> served as a<br />

guardian <strong>of</strong> this sett<strong>in</strong>g, its residents, <strong>and</strong> their possessions. Fidelity <strong>and</strong> vigilance—an<br />

essential feature <strong>of</strong> cunn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>telligence—were two qualities for which the animal was<br />

esteemed, whereas its ability to fawn <strong>and</strong> bite at once marked it as a deceptive <strong>and</strong><br />

260 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> the Greek adoption <strong>of</strong> Persian practices as a sign <strong>of</strong> prosperity <strong>and</strong> power, <strong>and</strong><br />

literary evidence (e.g., Klearchos <strong>in</strong> Ath. Deipn. 12.54) that charges Polycrates with the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

his own animal park (paradeisos) <strong>in</strong> emulation <strong>of</strong> Sardis, see M. C. Miller, Athens <strong>and</strong> Persia <strong>in</strong> the Fifth<br />

Century B.C. A Study <strong>in</strong> Cultural Receptivity (Cambridge, 1997) 188-189.<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!