24.04.2013 Views

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

The Judgment of Animals in Classical Greece: Animal Sculpture and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

great works <strong>of</strong> the Greeks; but the labyr<strong>in</strong>th surpasses the pyramids also. It has<br />

twelve ro<strong>of</strong>ed courts, with doors fac<strong>in</strong>g one another, six to the north <strong>and</strong> six to the<br />

south <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> a cont<strong>in</strong>uous l<strong>in</strong>e. One wall on the outside encompasses them all.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are double sets <strong>of</strong> chambers <strong>in</strong> it, some underground <strong>and</strong> some above, <strong>and</strong><br />

their number is three thous<strong>and</strong>; there are fifteen hundred <strong>of</strong> each. We ourselves<br />

saw the aboveground chambers, for we went through them <strong>and</strong> so we can talk <strong>of</strong><br />

them, but the underground chambers we can speak only from hearsay. For the<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the Egyptians entirely refused to show us these, say<strong>in</strong>g that there are<br />

<strong>in</strong> them the c<strong>of</strong>f<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>gs who had built the labyr<strong>in</strong>th at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

also those <strong>of</strong> the holy crocodiles. So we speak from hearsay <strong>of</strong> these underground<br />

places; but what we saw aboveground was certa<strong>in</strong>ly greater than all human works.<br />

<strong>The</strong> passages through the rooms <strong>and</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g go<strong>in</strong>gs-<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> out through the<br />

courts, <strong>in</strong> their extreme complication, caused us countless marvel<strong>in</strong>gs as we went<br />

through, from the court <strong>in</strong>to the rooms, <strong>and</strong> from the rooms <strong>in</strong>to the pillared<br />

corridors, <strong>and</strong> then from these corridors <strong>in</strong>to other rooms aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> from the<br />

rooms <strong>in</strong>to other courts afterwards. <strong>The</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the whole is stone, as the walls<br />

are, <strong>and</strong> the walls are full <strong>of</strong> tu&pwn e0ggeglumme/nwn, <strong>and</strong> each court is set round<br />

with pillars <strong>of</strong> white stone, very exactly fitted. At the corner where the labyr<strong>in</strong>th<br />

ends there is, nearby, a pyramid two hundred <strong>and</strong> forty feet high <strong>and</strong> e0n th|~ zw|~a<br />

mega&la e0gge/gluptai. <strong>The</strong> road to this is made underground. (2.148) [102]<br />

<strong>The</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g that Herodotus calls the labyr<strong>in</strong>th has been a topic <strong>of</strong> controversy<br />

among scholars. <strong>The</strong> controversy has arisen from the fact that no securely identified<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong> fact no rema<strong>in</strong>s exist at all that plausibly fit Herodotus’ description. Both the<br />

labyr<strong>in</strong>th <strong>and</strong> the pyramid mentioned <strong>in</strong> this passage have been considered elements <strong>of</strong><br />

the pyramid enclosure <strong>of</strong> Amenemhat III constructed <strong>in</strong> the twelfth dynasty (ca. 1842-<br />

1797) at Hawara <strong>in</strong> the central Fayum. <strong>The</strong> labyr<strong>in</strong>th has been equated with a structure,<br />

also called the mortuary temple, located to the south <strong>of</strong> the pyramid <strong>and</strong> thought to be <strong>of</strong><br />

impressive dimensions. 432 What survives today <strong>of</strong> this structure is only a foundation bed<br />

432 Lehner, <strong>The</strong> Complete Pyramids 183; Lloyd, Herodotus. Book II 121-124 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all<br />

classical authors, who refer to the labyr<strong>in</strong>th. His fig. 1 is a reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the structure based on<br />

Herodotus’ description supplemented by those <strong>of</strong> Strabo <strong>and</strong> Pl<strong>in</strong>y. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the 1890 excavation report<br />

<strong>and</strong> reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the structure by Fl<strong>in</strong>ders Petrie, he also suggests (122) that the labyr<strong>in</strong>th was an<br />

oblong build<strong>in</strong>g (304.5m long; 243.6m wide) “divided across the middle from W. to E. by a cross wall, to<br />

the south <strong>of</strong> which lay the aulai <strong>of</strong> Herodotus.” For a summary <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the exploration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Hawara labyr<strong>in</strong>th, <strong>and</strong> the issue <strong>of</strong> identification, see E. P. Uphill, Pharaoh’s Gateway to Eternity: <strong>The</strong><br />

Hawara Labyr<strong>in</strong>th <strong>of</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g Amenemhat III (London <strong>and</strong> New York, 2000) 1-9. For a brief discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

discrepancy between Herodotus’ chronology (seventh century B.C.) <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the labyr<strong>in</strong>th <strong>and</strong><br />

248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!