25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CtwxR 6<br />

Acceptance CnItenad<br />

The acceptance criteria for the information on the confinement and HVAC system<br />

ESFs include the following:<br />

* The need for a confinement ESF has been properly identified. To be<br />

considered an ESF, design features must exist to mitigate the consequences<br />

of specific accident scenarios.<br />

* Any ESF in addition to the confinement (e.g., HVAC systems) does not<br />

interfere with normal operations or safe reactor shutdown.<br />

* The ESF design features should ensure that the system is available and<br />

operable when it is required for mitigating accident consequences.<br />

* The minimum design goal of the confinement ESFs should be to reduce<br />

below regulatory limits the potential radiological exposures to the ficility<br />

staff and members of the public for the accidents discussed at the beginning<br />

of this chapter for test and research reactors. Any additional reduction in<br />

potential radiological exposures below the regulatory limits is desirable and<br />

. should be a design goal if it can be reasonably achieved.<br />

* The design of the confinement should not transfer undue radiological risk<br />

to the health and safety of the public in order to reduce potential exposures<br />

to the facility staff.<br />

* The instrumentation and control (I&C) system of the confinement ESF<br />

systems should be as basic and fail safe as possible. They should be<br />

designed to remain functional for the full range of potential operational<br />

conditions, including the environment created by accident scenarios.<br />

* The discussions should identify operational limits, design parameters,<br />

surveillances, and surveillance intervals that will be included in the technical<br />

specifications.<br />

Review Procedures<br />

The applicant should show that the confinement ESFs reduce predicted<br />

radiological exposures and releases from applicable potential accidents to<br />

acceptable levels as discussed at the beginning of this chapter. The reviewer<br />

should examine all accident scenarios analyzed in Chapter 13 of the SAR that<br />

could lead to significant radiological exposures or releases and verify that<br />

consequences can be sufficiently mitigated by the confinement ESF. The reviewer<br />

should confirm that the design and functional bases of confinement ESFs are<br />

REV 0,2196<br />

<strong>NUREG</strong>-<strong>1537</strong>,PART2 REV 0, 2196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!