25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Acceptance Criteria<br />

_HEU TOLEU CoNvERsioN<br />

Acceptance criteria should be based on the following considerations. If no<br />

modification is proposed, the LEU core operating conditions (e.g., neutron<br />

spectrum and flux levels) or components should not cause loads, stresses, or<br />

changes in material response that significantly change the core support function<br />

from those currently acceptable for the HEU core components. If there are<br />

proposed changes in the core support structures to accommodate the conversion,<br />

they should be specified and analyzed to ensure that LEU geometry will be<br />

maintained and loads will not be beyond design limits. Proposed changes in the<br />

design specifications and tolerances should not be significantly different from those<br />

for the current HEU core system. If major modifications or replacement of the<br />

core support structure are proposed, in addition to the above structural designs,<br />

the design should not decrease resistance to corrosion and erosion or cause a<br />

significant increase in long-term induced radioactivity above that for the existing<br />

HEU core support system. (This latter issue generally relates to'maintenance and<br />

ultimate decommissioning and should not be'an operational safety issue.)<br />

Review Procedures<br />

The reviewer should compare the design specifications for the proposed<br />

modifications to the core support systems with those systems used with the BEU<br />

core. The reviewer should compare changes in functional stresses between the<br />

two systems and the capabilities to withstand the stresses for the projected<br />

duration of the license with LEU core conditions (e.g., neutron spectrum and flux<br />

levels). The reviewer should compare construction materials or structure, reactor<br />

operating characteristics, and mechanisms of degradation. If the core support<br />

structures will not be changed, the reviewer should determine the change in weight'<br />

between the HEU and LEU fuels and cores and its'effect -on the support structures<br />

and any changes in reactor operating characteristics that could affect the core<br />

support systems.<br />

Evaluation Findings<br />

This section of the SAR should contain sufficient information to support the<br />

following type 6f conclusions, which will be included in'the staff's safety<br />

evaluation report: - -<br />

The proposed core support structure for the LEU-fueled reactor will not<br />

provide significantly less reliable support, rigidity, and spacings of core<br />

components thin the existing system for BEU fuel.<br />

REv. 0,2196 13. Smiauu, REVIEW PLA1<br />

REV. O. 2/96 13. STANDARD REvmw PLAN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!