25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXPERDm4TAL FACIaTES AND UTiLIZATnoN<br />

* experiment design requirements and classification methodology<br />

administrative controls, including appropriate review and approval of safety<br />

analysis in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 for experiments not included in<br />

the SAR.'<br />

* allowed and possible capsule materi experimental materials, and<br />

structural composition and types<br />

* radiation heating and other radiation damage<br />

* malfunction or failure modes of experimental facilities and axperiments,<br />

including radiological hazards and controls<br />

Accepance Criteria<br />

The acceptance criteria for the infoimation on experunent review include the<br />

following:<br />

* The experiment safety review committee should consist of individuals with<br />

extensive experience in reactor operations, radiation protection, conduct of<br />

experiments, and the mechanical, electrical, radiological, and chemical<br />

behavior of materials in theoperational environment A functional<br />

organization chart should be provided showing in detail the composition<br />

and lines of communication of the committee with the reactor operations<br />

and administration staffs. The committee should be organizationally<br />

independent and operate without interference from the aexrimenters or<br />

reactor operations staff. The committee should function under a charter,<br />

and criteria for expeiment approval should be provided, including<br />

application of 10 CFR 50.59.<br />

* The applicant should describe the methodology that will be used to<br />

categorize proposed experiments according to risk potential. The types of<br />

categories used at the reactor facifity should be stated and requirements for<br />

each category listed. The appropriate level of review authority required to<br />

approve experiments in each category should be discussed. The<br />

information in this section of the SAR should be quantitative where<br />

possible (e.g., giving gram amounts, temperature degree limits,<br />

radioactivity limits, or reactivity limits) in delineating the bounds of the risk<br />

categories.. Methodology for using 10 CFR 50.59 to review all new<br />

experiments should be described, as well as how Regulatory Guides 2.2<br />

and 2.4 are usid.,<br />

REV. 0. 2J96 - * 10-9 STANDARD REVIEW PLAN<br />

REV.0.2%6 - - - . I ., 10-9 STANDARD REVMES PLAN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!