25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-- -<br />

APPENDKX 18.1<br />

temperature and reactivity changes in the fuel or moderator. All credible potential<br />

accidents should be considered when planning the reactor conversion.<br />

If the comparisons by the licensee of the eisting HEU- and proposed LEU-fueled<br />

reactors show sufficient similarity between the potential reactivity accidents and<br />

the consequences for the two fuels, a comparison of the scenario analyses should<br />

be performed, with quantitative checks at key points. The checks should examine<br />

the effects on the course of the accident evolution caused by the reactor design or<br />

operational parameters changed to accommodate the fuel conversion.<br />

If the comparisons of the existing HEU- and proposed LEU-fiieled reactors show<br />

significant differences in the types or consequences of potential reactivity<br />

accidents, new independent analyses for the proposed LEU-fueled reactor may be<br />

required. If new or revised analytical methods or assumptions are employed, the<br />

licensee should validate them with an analysis similar to that used for HEU<br />

accident scenarios.<br />

In all cases, the analyses should include the initial reactor conditions; the<br />

postulated initiating event; the evolution of the accident; assumed operational<br />

condition (including failures, malfunctions, or normal operational finction) of any<br />

barriers, protective systems, or actions; and the effect of any ESFs that stabilize the<br />

reactor condition. The consequences during and after the postulated accidents<br />

should be compared for the exsting HEU- and proposed LEU-fueled reactors<br />

Acceptance Criteria<br />

Acceptance criteria for the consequences of proposed reactivity accidents should<br />

be based on the following considerations:<br />

* The initiating events and scenarios for reactivity accidents should be<br />

consistent with those assumed for the BEU reactor, and should be based<br />

on physical principles and assumptions that are amenable to logical<br />

analyses.<br />

* Any significant differences in the initiating events or evolution of reactivity<br />

accidents between the xisting HEU- and proposed LEU-fiieled reactor<br />

should result from changes in reactor design parameers or operating<br />

conditions required to accommodate the conversion of the reactor from the<br />

use of HEU fuel.<br />

* The potential consequences of reactivity addition accidents for the<br />

proposed LEU-fueled reactor should be consistent with the acceptance<br />

criteria for the HEU-fleled reactor.<br />

<strong>NUREG</strong>- <strong>1537</strong>,PART 2<strong>NUREG</strong>-<strong>1537</strong>,PART2 46<br />

REV O,2i96<br />

46 REV 0, 2196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!