25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2.2 Control Rods<br />

Areas of Revew<br />

REAC DESaRIPTON<br />

The control rods in a non-power reactor are designed to change reactivity by<br />

changing the amount of neutron absorber (or fuel) in or near the reactor core.<br />

Depending on their function, control rods can be designated as regulating, safety,<br />

shim, or transient rods. To scram'the reactor, the negative reactivity' of the control<br />

rods is usually'added passively and quickly when the rods drop into the core,<br />

although gravity can be assisted byspring action. In the case of control rods<br />

fabricated completely of fuel, the rods fall out of the bottom of the core. Because<br />

the control rods serve a dual function (control and safety), control and safety<br />

systems for non-power reactors are usually not completely separable. In nonpower<br />

reactors, a scram does not challenge the safety of the reactor or cause any<br />

undue strain on any systems or components associated with the reactor.<br />

The areas of review are discussed in this section of the format and content guide.<br />

Acceptance Criteria<br />

The acceptance criteria for the information on control rods include the following:<br />

The control rods, blades, followers (if used), and support'systems should<br />

bedesigned consevativelytowithstand-all anticipated stresses and'<br />

challenges from mechanical, hydraulic, and thermal forces and the effects of<br />

their chemical and radiation environment.<br />

* The control rods should be sufficient in number and reactivity worth to<br />

comply with the 'single stuck rod' criterion; that is, it should be possible to<br />

shut down the reactor and comply with the requirement of minimum<br />

shutdown margin with the highest worth scrammable control rod stuck out<br />

of the core., The control rods should also be sufficient to control the<br />

- reactor in all designed operating modes and to shut down the reactor safely<br />

from any operational condition. The design based for redundancy and<br />

diversity should ensure these functions.<br />

* The control rods should be designed for rapid, fail-safe shutdown of the<br />

reactor from any operting condition. The discussion should address<br />

* conditions under which normal electrical power is lost.-:<br />

* The control rods should be designed so that scramming them 'does not<br />

challenge their integrity or operation or the integrity or operation of other<br />

* reactor systems.<br />

STANnD REVIEW PLAN<br />

REv. REV. 0.2196 0,2/96 STADmAD REvmwVPLAN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!