25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SrYI CHARAcrIsnTc<br />

other water-induced damage at the site. 'The information should cover the possible<br />

hydrologic events, their causes, historic and predicted frequencies, and potential<br />

consequences to the reactor facility. The water table should be located, and the<br />

potential for radioactive contamination of ground and surface waters should be<br />

discussed.<br />

Acceptance Criteria<br />

The acceptance criteria for the information on hydrology includes the following:<br />

* :The facility is located and designed to'withstand credible hydrologic events.<br />

Locations of particular concern include'a flood plain, downriver of a dam,<br />

and close to the seashore and sea level.<br />

Potential events it the site that could cause nearby hydrologic<br />

consequences are shown not to present significint risk to the facility.<br />

* Facility design bases are derived sufficie'ntly from predicted hydrologic<br />

events that there is reasonable assurance that such events would not<br />

preclude safe operation and shutdown of the reactor.<br />

* The reactor facility design bases contain provisions to mitigate or prevent<br />

uncontrolled release of radioactive material in the event of a predicted<br />

hydrologic occurrence. Potential consequences of such an event are<br />

considered or bounded by accidents analyzed in Chapter 13 of the SAR.<br />

* Facility design bases consider leakage or loss of primary coolant to ground<br />

water, neutron activation of ground water, and deposition of released:<br />

airborne radioactive material in surface water.<br />

Revew .ocedures ..<br />

The reviewer should verify that the site has been'selected with due consideration of<br />

potential hydrologic events and consequences, including any that could be initiated<br />

by either local or distant seismic disturbances. In addition, the reviewer should '<br />

ascertain the design bases incorporated into the facility design to address predicted<br />

hydrologic events, accidental release or leakage of primary coolant, and<br />

radioactive contamination of ground or surface waters<br />

Evaluation Findings - -.<br />

This section of the SAR should contain sufficient information to support the<br />

following types of conclusions, which will be included in the staffs safety<br />

evaluation report:<br />

REV.0, 2196 2-7 STANDARD REVEMW PLAN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!