25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ThE ForAaXy<br />

agreement with the Department of Energy (DOE) for the disposal of highlevel<br />

radioactive wastes and spent nuclear fuel. DOE (R. L. Morgan)<br />

informed <strong>NRC</strong> (H. Denton) by letter dated May 3, 1983,* that it had<br />

determined that universities and other'govermnent agencies operating nonpower<br />

reactors have entered into contracts with DOE that provide that,<br />

DOE retain title to the fuel and be obligated to take the'spent fuel and/or<br />

bigh-level waste for storage or reprocessing. Because (insert name of<br />

applicant) has entered into such a contract with DOE, the applicable<br />

requirements of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 have been satisfied.<br />

(If the applicant is a corporation) Section 302(b)l)(B) of the Nuclear<br />

Waste Policy Act of 1982 states that <strong>NRC</strong> may require, as a precondition<br />

to issuing or renewing an opeiating license for a' research or test reactor,<br />

that the applicant shall have entered into an agreement with the Department<br />

of Energy (DOE) for the disposal of high-level radioactive wastes and<br />

spent nuclear fuel. (Insert name of applicant) has entered into a contract<br />

with DOE [Contract (insert conbact number) for the ultimate disposal of<br />

the fuel in the (insert name ofa plicant's reactor).] Because (insert name<br />

of applicant) has entered into such a contracl with DOE, the applicable<br />

requirements of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 have been satisfied.<br />

1.8 Facility Modifications and History<br />

Areas of Review<br />

If the SAR describes a new facility, the reviewer need only eamine the relevant<br />

history of applicant activities before the application and the SAR are submitted,<br />

including any experience with other non-power reactors.<br />

If the SAR is submitted as part of a license renewal application, the reviewer<br />

should confirm the history of the facility, including amendments to the license, with<br />

dates and purposes. The reviewer should also evaluate any significant changes in<br />

the previous SAR conditions not requiring <strong>NRC</strong> approval under 10 CFR 50.59 or<br />

other regulations. This discussion should include any significant facility<br />

modifications and their effect on operations and releases of radioactive effluents to<br />

unrestricted areas.<br />

'Tlc DOE lettr is reprobced at the 1Cd of this chapte as Appendix 1.2.<br />

REV. 0,2/96 1-13 STANDARD REVIEW PLAN<br />

REV.0, 2/96 1-13 STANDARD REVIEW PLAN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!