25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPT6<br />

* The design that should reduce below regulatory limits the potential J<br />

radiological exposures to the facility staff and members of the public for the<br />

accidents discussed at the beginning of this chapter. Any additional<br />

reduction in potential radiological exposures below the regulatory limits is<br />

desirable and should be a design goal if it can be reasonably achieved.<br />

* The containment should not interfere with either normal operation or<br />

reactor shutdown.<br />

* The design features and surveillance program should ensure that the<br />

containment will be available and operable if the ESF system is needed.<br />

* The design of the containment should not transfer undue radiological risk<br />

to the health and safety of the public in order to reduce potential exposures<br />

to the facility staff.<br />

* The I&C system of the containment ESF system should be as basic and fail<br />

safe as possible. They should be designed to operate in the environment<br />

created by the accident scenario.<br />

* The discussions should identify operational limits, design parameters, and<br />

surveillances to be included in the technical specifications.<br />

Review Procedures<br />

The reviewer should review the accident scenarios and the applicable design bases<br />

for a containment ESF and the design and functional features of the ESF and the<br />

mitigating effects on the radiological consequences evaluated The net projected<br />

radiological exposures should be compared with the limits of 10 CFR <strong>Part</strong>s 20 or<br />

100 to determine if the design is acceptable.<br />

Evalualion Findings<br />

This section of the SAR should contain sufficient informnation to support the<br />

following types of conclusions, which will be included in the safety evaluation<br />

report:<br />

* The applicant has identified a potential or maximum hypothetical accident<br />

as a result of which projected exposures to the public without containment<br />

would be greater than acceptable limits.<br />

* The design and functional features proposed for a containment reasonably<br />

ensure that exposures will be reduced below the limits of 10 CFR <strong>Part</strong> 20<br />

for research reactors, or 10 CFR <strong>Part</strong> 100 for test reactors, with an<br />

NUR.EG.<strong>1537</strong>, PT 2 6-10 REv 0.2/96<br />

<strong>NUREG</strong>- <strong>1537</strong>, PART 2 6-10 REV 0, 2J96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!