25.06.2013 Views

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

NUREG-1537, Part 2 - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE FACILTIY<br />

Applicants are expected to use pertinent information from these and other reactors<br />

in their design, and the reviewer should compare'the submitted information with<br />

the referenced facility designs. Areas of the SAR that may be reviewed by<br />

comparison or reference to similar facilities could include the following:<br />

Chapter 4, "Reactor Description," and Chapter 13 for'the bases of <strong>NRC</strong>'s<br />

acceptance of fuel performance [e.g.,- SPERT, the Oak Ridge Research<br />

Reactor (ORRR), the system for nuclear auxiliary power (SNAP), the<br />

General Atomics reactor for training and isotope production (TRIGA), the<br />

MTR, and the advanced test reactor (ATR)]<br />

* Chapters 4 and 13 forthe bases for reactor core critical size and geometry<br />

[e.g., BSF, TRIGA, CP-5, the Argonne nuclear assembly for CP-1 I<br />

(Argonaut), and SPERT]<br />

* Chapter 6, "Engineered Safety Features," for the bases of accident<br />

mitigation systems (most reactor types)<br />

* Chapter 7, "Instrumentation and Control Systems," for thie bases of<br />

redundancy and diversity in instruments and controls, including scram<br />

(reactor shutdown) systems [e.g., BSF, TRIGA, Omega West Reactor<br />

(OWR), MTR, and CP-5]<br />

* other specific license conditions acceptable to <strong>NRC</strong> of other facilities that<br />

demonstrate acceptable technical performance (previously licensed facilities<br />

with similar thermal power level, similar fuel type, and similar siting<br />

considerations)<br />

Acceptance Criteria<br />

The acceptance criteria for the comparison of this facility with similar facilities<br />

include the following:'<br />

* The comparisons should show that the proposed facility would not exceed<br />

the safety envelope of the similar facilities.<br />

* There should be reasonable 'assurance that radiological exposures of the<br />

public would not exceed the regulations and the guidelines of the proposed<br />

facility ALARA program.<br />

Review Procedures<br />

The reviewer should confirm that the characteristics of any facilities compared<br />

with the proposed facility are similar and relevant. The reviewer should verify that<br />

REV. 0, 2/96 1-9 STMw REVIEW PLAN<br />

- REV. O. 2/96 1 9 STANDARD REviEw PLAN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!