30.06.2013 Views

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case Study Two<br />

Eight action research meet<strong>in</strong>gs took place at the k<strong>in</strong>dergarten, either after<br />

a session or <strong>in</strong> non-contact time on Wednesdays or Friday afternoons. There were<br />

two teachers at this centre and both were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the research and each of them<br />

attended all the meet<strong>in</strong>gs. The format of each meet<strong>in</strong>g was similar, with me<br />

arriv<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>formally observe the last 30-40 m<strong>in</strong>utes of the session and to help<br />

clean up. We then shared food I had brought and started our action research<br />

discussions.<br />

The data collection took place over 9 months. At the first meet<strong>in</strong>g we<br />

shared our personal bicultural journeys. After discuss<strong>in</strong>g our bicultural journeys<br />

the two teachers bra<strong>in</strong>stormed what constituted their ideal Tiriti-<strong>based</strong> <strong>curriculum</strong>,<br />

which I recorded and afterwards typed <strong>in</strong>to a chart for them. Additionally, an<br />

evaluation was planned and carried out by the teachers <strong>in</strong> which observations were<br />

a major method to which I contributed. Subsequently, there were five action<br />

research cycle meet<strong>in</strong>gs. These followed the typical action research cycles of plan,<br />

act, observe, and reflect. The f<strong>in</strong>al research session occurred after the k<strong>in</strong>dergarten<br />

had attended a pōwhiri at the local school and also <strong>in</strong>cluded an evaluation of the<br />

research process.<br />

Later, after the full draft report of the research with Case Study Two, I had<br />

a face-to-face <strong>in</strong>formal discussion with the head teacher, Alison, after she left the<br />

centre for another type of <strong>early</strong> childhood employment. This discussion with<br />

Alison was followed up with further email and phone <strong>in</strong>terviews. A phone<br />

<strong>in</strong>terview was also conducted with Brodie who cont<strong>in</strong>ued to teach at the<br />

k<strong>in</strong>dergarten. A discussion of <strong>in</strong>terviews as a method of research and specifically<br />

how they took place with the participants of this project is reported <strong>in</strong> the next<br />

chapter.<br />

3.3.2 My Issues with Action Research<br />

As I contemplated the first two case studies I realised I had some<br />

reservations about the effectiveness of the action research process, particularly <strong>in</strong><br />

Case Study One where my perception at times was that the progress of<br />

implement<strong>in</strong>g Tiriti-<strong>based</strong> <strong>curriculum</strong> seemed slow. Research with this centre had<br />

spanned over a year, rather than the 3 months orig<strong>in</strong>ally envisaged. I considered<br />

possible reasons, such as whether it was to do with the number of people <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!