30.06.2013 Views

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and Case Study Two (Decile 10) were roughly at opposite ends of the decile<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uum. The schools surround<strong>in</strong>g Case Study Three were Deciles 7and 8.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> terms of, for example, resources, where socio-economic<br />

disparity can show up, material differences for the centres <strong>in</strong> this study did not<br />

appear to be marked. All centres <strong>in</strong> Aotearoa New Zealand receive government<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g so what could make a difference is the ability of parents to provide<br />

additional money through fees, donations and fundrais<strong>in</strong>g. Informal conversation<br />

with teachers led me to conclude that few differences <strong>in</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g were apparent and<br />

thus, socio-economic status, on the surface at least, did not appear to be important<br />

for these three case studies. Put another way, although socio-economic status was<br />

not formally <strong>in</strong>vestigated (by access<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements etc.) there seemed to<br />

be a remarkable similarity of resourc<strong>in</strong>g between each of the centres – at least to<br />

the casual or even frequent observer.<br />

5.5.4 Involv<strong>in</strong>g Managers 3<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al factor I had wanted to <strong>in</strong>vestigate (but was unable to) was the<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence of management structures <strong>in</strong> multi-owned or cha<strong>in</strong>s of centres. Although<br />

I was unable to co-research with teachers from a large cha<strong>in</strong> (as noted <strong>in</strong> chapter 4),<br />

I did meet with the owners of Case Study One centre. Case Study One, it will be<br />

recalled, was one of four centres and I wanted to <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether or not Tiriti-<br />

<strong>based</strong> <strong>curriculum</strong> was centrally managed and if so how.<br />

The owners of Case Study One told me that each supervisor had<br />

responsibility for runn<strong>in</strong>g their centre with a budget from which they could choose<br />

to order Tiriti-<strong>based</strong> resources such as puzzles and books. Management of areas<br />

such as human resources and book-keep<strong>in</strong>g were similar <strong>in</strong> all four centres, but<br />

were centrally controlled. After observ<strong>in</strong>g the centre practices and talk<strong>in</strong>g with D<br />

the supervisor it was apparent to me, therefore, that management practices <strong>in</strong> this<br />

group of centres did not adversely affect the implementation of Tiriti-<strong>based</strong><br />

<strong>curriculum</strong>.<br />

For these three case studies, a series of selection criteria were applied.<br />

However, the only factor which appeared to impact on Tiriti-<strong>based</strong> <strong>curriculum</strong> was<br />

3 The evidence for this section, unless referenced otherwise, comes from notes 24/3/04 of discussion held<br />

with the two owners.<br />

184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!