30.06.2013 Views

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The issues for these teachers, which were expressed ma<strong>in</strong>ly through their journals,<br />

were similar to those expressed by other teachers <strong>in</strong> this research and <strong>in</strong> the<br />

literature: learn<strong>in</strong>g te reo Māori, fear, lack of confidence, and the place of<br />

multiculturalism. These will be discussed <strong>in</strong> chapters 5 and 6.<br />

As I had become concerned about the value of action research and what I<br />

perceived as slow progress <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g Tiriti-<strong>based</strong> <strong>curriculum</strong>, I felt that<br />

reposition<strong>in</strong>g my methodological approach from action research to appreciative<br />

<strong>in</strong>quiry could enhance the implementation of Tiriti-<strong>based</strong> pedagogy. Tak<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

affirmative, appreciative stand to build on what participants were already do<strong>in</strong>g<br />

seemed to be the way forward. The appreciative <strong>in</strong>quiry model has four stages,<br />

which are described <strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />

Stages of Appreciative Inquiry<br />

The four broad stages of appreciative <strong>in</strong>quiry are discovery, dream,<br />

design, and dest<strong>in</strong>y. Each stage has provocative questions for participants to<br />

consider, share and decide to action. There are typical questions, statements and<br />

actions that encapsulate each stage (Cooperrider, 2003; English et al., 2003;<br />

Hammond, 1998; Reed et al., 2002; Yoder, 2005), as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Table 3.1.<br />

Table 3.1 Stages, Questions and Action of Appreciative Inquiry.<br />

Stages Questions Statement Actions (Whitney and<br />

Trosten-Bloom, 2003,<br />

p.6)<br />

1. Discover “What gives life?” Looks at the best of what<br />

is<br />

2. Dream “What might be?” Investigates what is the<br />

world call<strong>in</strong>g for –<br />

provocative propositions<br />

3. Design “What should be the<br />

ideal?”<br />

4. Dest<strong>in</strong>y/<br />

Deliver<br />

“How can we<br />

empower, learn, and<br />

adjust/improvise?”<br />

Appreciate what is<br />

Imag<strong>in</strong>e what might be.<br />

Co-construct<strong>in</strong>g Determ<strong>in</strong>e what should<br />

be<br />

Empower<strong>in</strong>g Create what will be<br />

The first stage of discovery is where participants are asked to th<strong>in</strong>k back<br />

through their lives/career/work to describe a high po<strong>in</strong>t when they felt most<br />

effective and engaged about the topic under discussion (Yoder, 2005). In this<br />

thesis that means Tiriti-<strong>based</strong> <strong>curriculum</strong>. Participants were asked to explore <strong>in</strong> a<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!