30.06.2013 Views

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

supporting tiriti-based curriculum delivery in mainstream early ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with the research, either directly or <strong>in</strong>directly, the tim<strong>in</strong>g of the meet<strong>in</strong>gs, the<br />

number of teachers and the fact that some were also study<strong>in</strong>g, and f<strong>in</strong>ally my skills<br />

as a researcher. One reason for my disquiet was the discrepancy between what I<br />

thought would happen <strong>in</strong> the process and what actually happened. Action research<br />

was not the neat cycle/s depicted <strong>in</strong> texts. I wrote <strong>in</strong> my research journal:<br />

It‟s not like the books!! The action research cycles are very<br />

muddy/muddled as observ<strong>in</strong>g, plann<strong>in</strong>g, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g and do<strong>in</strong>g are all<br />

reported [by participants] <strong>in</strong> an ad hoc way and not <strong>in</strong> a sequential<br />

manner. (Jl: CJ 28/3/2005)<br />

It occurred to me that the action research more closely resembled a ball of<br />

wool rather than the cyclical figures <strong>in</strong> books.<br />

Figure 3.3 My Initial Conception of the Realities of Action Research (Source: Google Images).<br />

As I reflected on action research meet<strong>in</strong>gs it became clear that dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

discussion process, co-researchers switched back and forth from the supposedly<br />

discrete phases of reflect, evaluate, and plan. Additionally, throughout the action,<br />

co-researchers switched back and forth from act, reflect, evaluate and plan.<br />

Whereas teachers were act<strong>in</strong>g and observ<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly with the children, teachers<br />

were also plann<strong>in</strong>g and reflect<strong>in</strong>g whilst they acted and observed. Similarly,<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g and reflect<strong>in</strong>g occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g research meet<strong>in</strong>gs, as teachers reported on<br />

their actions and observations. Was it a problem with<strong>in</strong> me that it didn‟t fit the<br />

neat, circular diagrams I found <strong>in</strong> books? I noted <strong>in</strong> my journal:<br />

There are <strong>in</strong>dividual teachers act<strong>in</strong>g, observ<strong>in</strong>g, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

as well as the team shar<strong>in</strong>g observations, plann<strong>in</strong>g together, act<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

this as a team and as <strong>in</strong>dividuals to then observe <strong>in</strong>dividually to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

thoughts to share when re-evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g /thoughts. „In the<br />

head‟ stuff is what is transported from the session (act and observe) to<br />

the meet<strong>in</strong>g (evaluation and plan). Although <strong>in</strong>deed, teachers are<br />

evaluat<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the session either impromptu and <strong>in</strong>dividually<br />

as well as impromptu and collectively. Unless the action is concerned<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!