04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

128 SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS<br />

3.5. <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Vans</strong> during the IMT and NMTs<br />

3.5.1. <strong>The</strong> Soviet Background<br />

<strong>The</strong> gas van claim played only a minor role during the International<br />

Military Tribunal (IMT) and the Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMTs)<br />

after the war. Not just with respect to this claim, these trials were an extensions<br />

of the Soviet wartime show trials discussed before. This is not<br />

just proven by the first reference of “gas vans” during the IMT, which<br />

occurred in the indictment with indirect reference to the claims made<br />

during the Soviet show trials in Krasnodar and Kharkov (IMT, vol. 1, p.<br />

49; shortly thereafter repeated by the Soviet prosecutor Ozol, vol. 2, p.<br />

63):<br />

“In Krasnodar some 6,700 civilians were murdered by poison<br />

gas in gas vans, […].<br />

In Kharkov about 195,000 persons were either tortured to death,<br />

shot, or gassed in gas vans.”<br />

In addition to these show trials, Soviet prosecutor Smirnov presented<br />

the minutes of a Soviet court-martial – of all things – held on 29 October<br />

1944, which claims the “annihilation of Soviet citizens in Smolensk<br />

in May 1943, by means of asphyxiation through carbon monoxide in<br />

gas vans.” <strong>The</strong> “information” gathered by Soviet court-martials were<br />

most certainly not more but rather less reliable than those gathered during<br />

the above discussed Soviet show trials (vol. 7, p. 465). <strong>The</strong> attempt<br />

of defense lawyer Dr. Kurt Kauffmann to have this obvious propaganda<br />

material excluded failed, though, because Art. 21 of the London Charter<br />

defining the rules of the IMT stated clearly that all evidence created by<br />

the victorious powers has to be accepted at face value (vol. 1, p. 15), or<br />

in legalese expressed by the court’s presiding judge Lord Geoffry Lawrence<br />

(vol. 7, p. 453):<br />

“Article 21 is perfectly clear, and it directs the Tribunal to take<br />

judicial notice of the various documents which are there set out, and<br />

expressly refers to the records and findings of military or other tribunals<br />

of any of the United Nations.”<br />

Other similar Soviet claims about “gas vans” were similarly based<br />

on the “findings” of investigations conducted by Soviet commissions<br />

(vol. 7, pp. 503, 544, 556, 571-575). In this context the Soviet prosecution<br />

quoted from a deposition allegedly made by a German soldier<br />

named E.M. Fenchel who is said to have been a PoW of the USSR. This<br />

deposition had been published in 1943 by the Soviet Embassy in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!