04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS 71<br />

the open position during a hypothetical gassing operation to prevent excess<br />

pressures. So what were the flaps good for? <strong>The</strong> only technically<br />

plausible reason for adding such flaps is to prevent both the formation<br />

of excess pressure and a free exchange of air while no exhaust gases<br />

were piped into the cargo box. But why was that necessary, if the vans<br />

served no other purpose than gassing people? I will return to this point<br />

in chapter 2.2.6. when discussing the likely real purpose of these RSHA<br />

special vehicles. Anyway, the uselessness of these flaps for a hypothetical<br />

gassing van seems to have slipped the author’s attention.<br />

I should add here that in a later, probably authentic RSHA document<br />

of 23 June 1942 reference is made to the fact that the first 20 Saurer<br />

trucks delivered to the RSHA had “openings covered with sliders” in<br />

their back doors, which means that the cargo boxes of the real Saurer<br />

trucks never sealed hermetically, although such sliders could have been<br />

a major obstacle for excess gases to escape, depending on their design.<br />

<strong>The</strong> RSHA document mentioned requested the replacement of these<br />

sliders with slits of the same kind as described in the Just document (see<br />

point 7 of this document on p. 323), whereas the Just document gives<br />

the impression that the slits were not as replacement item but rather a<br />

new feature.<br />

2. Shortening the cargo box<br />

<strong>The</strong> two paragraphs dedicated to this demand seem to be the result<br />

of an abstract intellectual construct.<br />

– First the author of the memo states that the Saurer truck cannot be<br />

loaded with 9 to 10 per m 2 , “because their off-road capability is highly<br />

reduced by this,” “although no overloading occurs thereby.”<br />

1. Remark: If considering that the cargo boxes installed on the<br />

Saurer chassis had a surface area of (5.8 m × 2.3 m ) 20 13.3 m², then a<br />

loading density of nine to ten persons per m² would have resulted in a<br />

load between 120 and 133 persons.<br />

First of all, this amount is at the upper range of what witnesses have<br />

claimed about these vehicles, whereas the most frequent claim is about<br />

50 to 60 persons (see chapter 4.2.4).<br />

Next, assuming an average weight of 60 kg per persons, 48 this density<br />

would also have resulted in a total load between seven and eight metric<br />

tons, which is two to three tons (40 to 60%) over the maximum load<br />

48 Usually an average weight of 75 kg is assumed for adults, but since the lower weight of<br />

children has to considered, I have reduced this average weight to 60 kg.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!