04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

272 SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS<br />

I will not argue here that carbon monoxide would not have been a<br />

good choice for the Germans – or anyone else intending to kill with a<br />

toxic gas. Any other, more potent agent always has the severe drawback<br />

that it is also very dangerous for the perpetrator. But not CO, if a few<br />

safety rules are observed. In addition, CO can be generated easily and<br />

cheaply, is easily applied, and is easy to discard. Once released into the<br />

environment, it quickly dilutes down to harmless concentrations and is<br />

rapidly oxidized to innocuous CO2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> question is: how would the Germans, ingenious engineers and<br />

chemists as they were back then, have constructed a “gas van”? I do not<br />

wish to go into details here, but will focus mainly on the source of carbon<br />

monoxide. <strong>The</strong> attentive reader might already guess what I am getting<br />

at: producer gas vehicles. Already after World War One this technique<br />

was developed in Germany, and during World War Two the<br />

Germans improved that technique to a high standard and produced hundreds<br />

of thousands of these devices.<br />

Hence, if the Germans had used the Saurer trucks mentioned in the<br />

Gaubschat exchange as gas vans – or any other truck – they would have<br />

been equipped with wood gas generators, and this very gas – before(!)<br />

entering the engine – would have been used to kill the inmates locked<br />

up on the cargo box. I have prepared a drawing of such an operational<br />

hypothetical Saurer gas van; see Illustration 27 (p. 379).<br />

Illustration 26 (p. 378), on the other hand, shows a draft of an impossible<br />

“gas van” as described in the pertinent literature using the exhaust<br />

gases of a Saurer Diesel engine, piped into the cargo box’s floor<br />

via a metal hose. <strong>The</strong> vehicle’s dimensions are based on the Gaubschat<br />

correspondence (cargo box height to length ration 1.7:5.8). <strong>The</strong> problems<br />

with such a design are insurmountable. Such vans could simply<br />

not have served the function ascribed to them.<br />

Today, after several decades of extended and exhaustive archival<br />

and forensic studies, we know with a probability bordering at certainty<br />

that there never were any stationary “gas chambers” for the mass murder<br />

of human beings. 127 Is the situation identical with regard to the “gas<br />

vans”? Back in 1994 Pierre Marais concluded in his tome that his studies<br />

did not yield any evidence for their existence. Although I have been<br />

127 For this see the various studies: Berg 2003; Crowell 2000/2011; Graf/Kues/Mattogno<br />

2010; Mattogno/Graf 2005; Leuchter/Faurisson/Rudolf 2011; Mattogno 2004a&b,<br />

2005a&b, 2010, 2011b; Rudolf 2011.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!