04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222 SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS<br />

Much of the “facts” about the alleged gas van deployed in Serbia as<br />

stated by the verdict have been taken from the various documents discussed<br />

here in chapter 2. Even the height of the van’s cargo box (1.70<br />

m, p. 680) was obviously taken from the Gaubschat correspondence<br />

(memo of 27 April 1942). About the gassing mechanism the verdict<br />

states (ibid.):<br />

“<strong>The</strong> vehicle was equipped with a special device (lever, connecting<br />

hoses and pipe) allowing for the poisonous carbon monoxide<br />

gases of the running engine to be piped into the cargo box […]. <strong>The</strong><br />

device serving this purpose could not be seen from the outside.”<br />

Here we have yet another story about a lever inside the driver’s cabin<br />

(as it was not visible on the outside) and several hoses. This resembles<br />

the description as given in the Cologne verdict against Dr. Schäfer<br />

for the same crimes allegedly committed in Serbia (see chapter 3.7.2.4),<br />

and it may be assumed that it was actually copied from there. No further<br />

detail about the van’s equipment is given.<br />

In one regard the present verdict deviates from the 1953 Cologne<br />

verdict discussed in chapter 3.7.2.4: it claims that the victim’s luggage<br />

was transported in a separate truck along with the gas van to the burial<br />

site (p. 681). If that is so, the question arises: why would the Germans<br />

have sent the victim’s luggage on a separate truck together with the<br />

“gas van” to the burial site? Did they bury the luggage as well? This<br />

makes sense only if this convoy was not a homicidal one driving to a<br />

burial site, but rather one serving to relocate the persons with their luggage.<br />

118<br />

In this context it is interesting to note that Andorfer’s attitude toward<br />

the inmates of the Semlin camp was quite the opposite of what one<br />

might surmise, as Browning reported (Browning 1983, p. 63):<br />

“Finally, the new commandant, Herbert Andorfer, noting that the<br />

food ordered represented the absolute minimum required rations,<br />

threatened that no bills would be authorized until all orders were<br />

filled. <strong>The</strong> Belgrade municipal government warned its Department<br />

of Social Welfare that the Germans were ready to prosecute those<br />

responsible for unfilled orders for urgently needed supplies. Up to<br />

this point, at least, the German commandants were not behaving as<br />

if they knew that their prisoners were soon to be murdered.”<br />

118 Browning claims that the luggage truck eventually turned off (Browning 1983, p. 80).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!