04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS 175<br />

years imprisonment is considered the threshold beyond which prison<br />

terms really start wreaking havoc on a defendant’s life. Hence 46 of 69,<br />

that is two thirds of all defendants got away rather cheaply.<br />

Juxtapose this with the prison terms meted out in West Germany for<br />

doubting or contesting the claims made by these West German court<br />

verdicts – that is to say: punishments of <strong>Holocaust</strong> revisionists, see the<br />

table just underneath the one mentioned previously listing some of the<br />

most prominent cases. One of them, Sylvia Stolz, is actually a lawyer<br />

who was punished for her defense activities on behalf of Ernst Zündel.<br />

From this we can see that today in West Germany the judiciary punishes<br />

a defendant who kills one Jew or even a great many of them with<br />

a similar severity as it punishes a defendant who disagrees with a Jew<br />

(or a German judge, for that matter).<br />

3.7.2. From 1949 to 1959 (4 trials)<br />

3.7.2.1. LG Stuttgart, Verdict of 8 Nov. 1949 & 15 Aug. 1950<br />

During this trial a defendant was prosecuted who had been incarcerated<br />

since war’s end and was to see the light of day no more in his life:<br />

Ferdinand Göhler. In 1941 he was employed in the town administration<br />

of Kalisch, where he was also concerned with the administration of the<br />

camp Bornhagen (Polish: Kozminek), where Polish Jews had been incarcerated.<br />

Although the original indictment of 25 April 1949 accused<br />

him of having been involved in the resettlement of Jews at the end of<br />

November 1941 (p. 190, 217), during which several hundred Jews are<br />

said to have been killed by means of “gas vans,” the court of the first<br />

trial declared this case beyond its jurisdiction. As this decision was confirmed<br />

on appeal, this issue was no longer dealt with in detail during the<br />

retrial of the case in 1950, so no verdict was passed in this regard at all<br />

(p. 191). <strong>The</strong> court nevertheless made a few statements in this regard,<br />

which I quote:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> removal was done with a special vehicle, which had the<br />

shape of a moving truck and which could be entered from the back.<br />

Due to its dark paint, it was called ‘black van.’ According to the<br />

opinion of the Jewish witnesses, a gassing device was installed inside<br />

of it, which could be turned on during transit. Nobody could<br />

make specific statements about this […].” (p. 200)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!