04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS<br />

capacity of the Saurer trucks of five tons. 46 Hence the statement “although<br />

no overloading occurs thereby” is clearly false.<br />

Finally I may suggest that it is psychologically impossible to pack<br />

people that dense under the claimed circumstances without having their<br />

disciplined cooperation. Beating them up and threatening them, as the<br />

perpetrators are said to have done according to numerous court verdicts,<br />

would more likely have led to panic rather than cooperation. In this context<br />

Marais cited a newspaper report, according to which the Japanese<br />

traveling in Tokyo’s subways do not succeed to pack themselves more<br />

densely than just over seven people per m², although they all cooperate<br />

and try hard (Le Monde, 20/21 January 1985).<br />

Hence the claim that nine to ten people per m² could be and usually<br />

were loaded into these trucks is simply bogus.<br />

2. Remark: <strong>The</strong> off-road capability of a vehicle depends for the most<br />

part on its design and not on its load. It is primarily ensured by the existence<br />

of several driven axles – the front axle among them – a reduction<br />

gear unit, and possibly a limited slip differential. (As to the reason<br />

of driving the truck off-road: from several court verdicts it emerges that<br />

the trucks are said to have been driven to off-road mass graves or tank<br />

ditches where the victims were allegedly buried.)<br />

– <strong>The</strong> author of the memo categorically states next: “A reduction of<br />

the load area appears to be necessary.”<br />

3. Remark: <strong>The</strong> way this sentence is phrased it implies that a reduction<br />

of the load area would compensate for the reduced off-road capability,<br />

which is very odd. But when continuing to read, it becomes apparent<br />

that the decrease in size is demanded for a different reason.<br />

– Next the author of the letter claims that the impeded off-road capabilities<br />

could not be remedied by “reducing the number of units.”<br />

4. Remark: Reducing the number of those locked up in the cargo box<br />

would indeed have solved the difficulty – if an excess load had been the<br />

reason to begin with. Yet such an approach is claimed unsuitable because…<br />

– <strong>The</strong> author of the document claims to prove that a mere reduction<br />

of the number of people per load would increase the time needed for the<br />

killing, “since the empty spaces also must be filled with CO.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!