04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS<br />

I will now scrutinize and comment on each of the demanded modifications.<br />

1. Adding slits and flaps<br />

<strong>The</strong> demand to have two slits of 10 cm × 1 cm added to the rear wall<br />

of the cargo box so that excess gas can escape means that at the time the<br />

memo was written no such slits existed and that the gas had no other<br />

way of escaping – or else the slits would have been superfluous. Hence<br />

the cargo boxes would have been sealed hermetically and the gas pressure<br />

would have built up inside until the doors were opened; many<br />

“witness testimonies” as well as the Becker document analyzed before<br />

confirm this explicitly. Nonetheless these boxes are said to have gassed<br />

almost 100,000 human beings. In my mind this is a radical impossibility.<br />

Connecting an exhaust pipe to a closed cargo box would have resulted<br />

in an immediate and rapid increase in gas pressure, which would ineluctably<br />

have led to the cargo box buckling and eventually bursting (see<br />

chapter 1.3.2.). That the cargo could have resisted the resulting high internal<br />

pressure is extremely unlikely, but even if that had been the case,<br />

then the engine would have died as soon as the counter pressure had<br />

reached a certain pressure.<br />

Considering these fact, how could it have been possible to gas even<br />

a single person under the described circumstances? <strong>The</strong> reference to an<br />

“explosion at Kulmhof” does not yield any answer either, for first of all<br />

it says that it was a single case, and second it is said to have been<br />

caused not by a flawed design but due to an operating error.<br />

If, however, openings are added to the cargo box, the situation<br />

changes instantly; the connecting hose can simply be attached to the exhaust<br />

pipe, and in this case the cargo box functions as a giant muffler,<br />

through which the exhaust gases flow.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author of the memo specifies that the slits are to be equipped<br />

with flaps “in order to allow for self-regulation of any potential excess<br />

pressure.” Unless this is simply a case of clumsy wording, we are dealing<br />

with an error in reasoning here. Of course it is the slits which prevent<br />

an overpressure, not the flaps; quite to the contrary, the latter create<br />

a minute overpressure already due to their weight and also because<br />

they cover a certain part of the slits, depending on the degree to which<br />

they are open. Considering that the amount of gas produced by the engine<br />

is considerable, these flaps would indeed have to be constantly in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!