04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS 41<br />

copy of the original, which, so she posits, should have remained with<br />

the sender rather than ended up in Berlin. This assumption is based on<br />

her hypothesis that the letter was written on very thin paper. Whether or<br />

not this letter was written on thin carbon copy paper remains to be<br />

demonstrated, as Mrs. Weckert had access only to copies of the original.<br />

But even if so, this doesn’t prove that the original letter wasn’t<br />

typed on such paper.<br />

In fact, the file 501-PS as archived in the U.S. National Archives<br />

contains two versions of this letter.<br />

One, which I call version A, is a three page white on black photostat<br />

of the alleged original. Since the photographic photostat process used in<br />

those years to make copies of documents inverted black and white, the<br />

original used to prepare this document must have been a normal black<br />

on white document.<br />

<strong>The</strong> other, version B, is a two page black on white copy full of typos,<br />

some of which reveal the Anglo-Saxon background of the typist.<br />

Instead of the signature the letter ends with a note “(Sgd),” i.e. the English<br />

abbreviation for “signed.” Hence it is clear that this version was<br />

typed by an Anglo-Saxon. Since it contains proper SS runes, it was obviously<br />

written on a German official wartime typewriter. This version<br />

also bears all the handwritten marks and words as version A, which are<br />

very similar both in position and in style to those on version A – except<br />

for Becker’s signature. All this is perfectly explicable, if one assumes<br />

that this document is a retyped copy of version A, which the typist tried<br />

to make appear as similar to version A as possible.<br />

<strong>The</strong> file 501-PS of the U.S. National Archives contains another document<br />

signed by Fred Niebergall, Chief of Document Control Branch of<br />

the Office of Chief of Counsel for War Crimes, Evidence Division, 32<br />

prepared on 19 July 1948, in which he certifies that the “attached photostat<br />

is a true and correct copy of the original.” Since photostats are negative<br />

photographic reproductions of documents, this can only refer to<br />

version A.<br />

It seems that the black on white (positive) version from which this<br />

photostat must have been taken is not part of the 501-PS file stored in<br />

the U.S. National Archives, although the Archive itself at one point had<br />

a black on white version of the first page of this document exhibited in<br />

a showcase, which has been photographed, see version C. This version<br />

32 This office handled the safekeeping and registration of all documents brought to Nuremberg<br />

for evidentiary purposes and assembled them into document series.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!