04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86 SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS<br />

quite independent of the unloading mechanism eventually chosen – as<br />

well as its auxiliary purpose in case of an unloading with an extractable<br />

grid: facilitating the extraction of the load.<br />

<strong>The</strong> low height of the gridwork designed to prevent that the load<br />

doesn’t fall between the end of the floor grid and the cargo box’s front<br />

wall isn’t just an objection to my hypothesis. It is an even more grave<br />

argument against the orthodox hypothesis according to which these<br />

RSHA special vehicles are identical with the infamous “gas vans” used<br />

to kill numerous living, that is to say: standing people crammed together<br />

in the cargo box with exhaust gases. It is obvious that, after the gassing<br />

operation, many of the tightly stacked corpses at the front part of<br />

the cargo box would have fallen over this small gridwork during unloading,<br />

thus preventing them from being automatically removed, no<br />

matter what the unloading mechanism would have been. To prevent<br />

standing people from toppling over a fence-like structure requires a<br />

height at least three times higher than requested (one meter and more).<br />

Another argument against the “gas van” hypothesis is the low height<br />

of the cargo box of only 1.70 m (memo of 27 April 1942). After installation<br />

of the retractable floor grid this height was reduced by 7.5 cm to a<br />

mere 162.5 cm (ibid. as well as order of 30 April 1942). Another even<br />

more drastic reduction of the free height occurred due to the new requested<br />

version with the floor grid rolling on U-shape rails (letter of 23<br />

June, #3), which could only be done by lifting the floor grid even higher<br />

(see Marais’ drawing on p. 311).<br />

Since the floor grid had to be installed on top of the wheel housings<br />

– which usually protrude much higher than just 7.5 cm from a cargo<br />

box floor – and since the lateral U-shaped guide rail would have rested<br />

on the mentioned extension of the wheel housings, much more than the<br />

claimed 7.5 cm would have been lost. As a matter of fact, the floor grid<br />

itself would already have had a height of some 5 cm, if it was to bear<br />

the weight of up to ten panicking people per square meter. I assume<br />

therefore that the height was reduced by at least 30 to 50 cm, which<br />

would have reduced the available height above the grid to some 1.20 to<br />

1.40 m. Quite apart from the reduction of the maximum loading capacity<br />

affected by this, it goes without saying that no grown-up individual<br />

would have been able to stand upright in that cargo box: <strong>The</strong> “passengers”<br />

would have had to bend over or even crawl into the van.<br />

Another argument against the gas van hypothesis is the vehicle model<br />

chosen. During the war, the German Wehrmacht obtained almost

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!