04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS 191<br />

probably confronted with it numerous times during his interrogations,<br />

so he learned step by step what was expected of him, and he duly complied.<br />

From these excerpts it becomes evident that Becker was really mentally<br />

confused. Mathias Beer, however, quotes Becker’s various depositions<br />

eleven times in his 1987 paper, without even once hinting at their<br />

problematic nature.<br />

3.7.4. From 1965 to 1969 (11 trials)<br />

3.7.4.1. LG Bonn, Verdicts of 30 Mar. 1963 & 23 July 1965<br />

This trial was directed against eleven defendants who were former<br />

officials of the Chemno/Kulmhof camp, where gas vans are said to<br />

have been the primary weapon of mass murder. It is therefore also one<br />

of the most detailed verdicts with regards to this question. Hence I will<br />

analyze it here more thoroughly than the other verdicts discussed in this<br />

chapter, whereby I will include Marais’ 1994 observations.<br />

After a retrial following an appeal of the first verdict, eight of the defendants<br />

were sentenced (3×13, 8, 7 years, 3×13½ months) and three<br />

exempt from punishment. None of the defendants denied the charges. 105<br />

Most insisted that they thought they had to follow orders, and those<br />

who stated that they tried to resist claimed that such resistance had either<br />

been futile or that they thought their own lives would have been in<br />

jeopardy, if they had tried.<br />

Although several defendants declared that they never had anything<br />

against Jews and actually got along with them pretty well before their<br />

deployment in Chemno, these could just be claims. This is different<br />

with defendant B. (Heinrich Bock) who “got engaged to a Jewess in<br />

Berlin in 1940” at a time when such an act could and usually did have<br />

negative repercussion even for the non-Jewish partner in such a relationship.<br />

This proves, as the court stated, that he indeed “had no antipathy<br />

against Jews,” and therefore considered “the killing of the Jews to<br />

be against morality and law.” Yet still he obediently followed all orders<br />

(pp. 253, 291f.).<br />

Another defendant (Me.) 106 even stated that his father, an opponent<br />

of National Socialism, had been arrested and severely mistreated by the<br />

105<br />

One of them (Sch.) tried to commit suicide when first confronted with the charges,<br />

though, p. 258.<br />

106<br />

Perhaps Kurt Meier; see<br />

www.holocaustresearchproject.org/othercamps/chelmnoSSstafflist.html.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!