04.07.2013 Views

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

The Gas Vans: A Critical Investigation - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SANTIAGO ALVAREZ, THE GAS VANS 219<br />

passages of the Hannover verdict. Regarding an analysis of this description<br />

I refer the reader therefore to the previous chapter.<br />

An article by the local newspaper Stuttgarter Nachrichten 117 quotes<br />

the witness Paul Werner, a wartime superior of Widmann, as having<br />

“consciously heard” about the “gas vans” only after the end of the war,<br />

just like Widmann insisted that during the war he never heard anything<br />

about Jews being killed in gas vans, although he admitted to have<br />

known about their existence. He claims to have thought that this was<br />

just an extension of the euthanasia action. He also declared to have performed<br />

gas analyses of the air inside such a “gas van” in action. <strong>The</strong><br />

verdict writes about this (pp. 567f.):<br />

“In the spring of 1942, possibly already in January 1942, the defendant,<br />

who by then knew about earlier gas analyses, and his<br />

coworkers received the order from Dr. Heess to once more perform<br />

measurements and gas analyses at a gas van located in the courtyard.<br />

[…] <strong>The</strong> purpose of these gas analyses was to either determine<br />

the time needed to obtain an absolutely lethal CO content of 1% in<br />

the cargo box, or whether an explosive gas mixture develops inside<br />

the van due to the exhaust gases piped into it (because such a van<br />

had exploded in Kulmhof in spring of 1942). Due to the measurements<br />

and gas analyses performed by the KTI and the technical<br />

works of the automotive department D 3a, the first Saurer vehicles<br />

were operable around January 1942.”<br />

Here we have another court reference to the explosion in<br />

Kulmhof/Chemno, this time even with cause given: the concentration<br />

of carbon monoxide inside the cargo box had allegedly risen beyond the<br />

lower explosion limit of 12%, although this value is unachievable with<br />

Diesel engines and extremely unlikely with gasoline engines. Also, if<br />

Widmann was indeed ordered to do measurements as early as January<br />

1942, the Chemno explosion must have occurred at the beginning of<br />

January 1942 at the latest, and not in May as the Bonn court had<br />

claimed.<br />

Widman, by the way, gave a different reason for taking gas samples<br />

inside a standing “gas van” with an idling Diesel engine: he claims that<br />

this was made in order to find out when a lethal content of 1% carbon<br />

monoxide in the air was reached (Beer 1987, p. 411) in order to ensure<br />

a swift execution. With exhaust gases from an idling Diesel engine,<br />

117 Newspaper article of the Stuttgarter Nachrichten posted at www.landesarchivbw.de/stal/grafeneck/grafeneck08b.htm<br />

(probably 16 March 1967).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!