05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ehearsal tak<strong>in</strong>g place prior to the assessment. However, despite no additional<br />

rehearsal or consolidation <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g, as well as the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g short and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive, some <strong>of</strong> the novel representations were stored <strong>in</strong> long-term memory<br />

and recalled when required (see Table 3.2). The qualitative data recorded that<br />

those participants who achieved the higher scores reported that they used<br />

mnemonic type strategies as depicted <strong>in</strong> Table 3.3. Those with the lower scores<br />

reported that they employed learn<strong>in</strong>g methods such as written copy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> details;<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g by repetition and others were unable to expla<strong>in</strong> their learn<strong>in</strong>g strategy.<br />

The stimuli used <strong>in</strong> this first prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study proved to be suitable for tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

new vocabulary <strong>in</strong> adults <strong>of</strong> normal language and cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g (see<br />

Table 3.1).<br />

The data from prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study one (see section 3.2.3) raised a number <strong>of</strong><br />

questions that were addressed <strong>in</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study two (see section 3.3). Firstly,<br />

could the lower scor<strong>in</strong>g participants from Group B (PS2, 3, 5 and 9) enhance<br />

their learn<strong>in</strong>g scores for similar new vocabulary through tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mnemonic<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies immediately prior to a tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g session? If so, it would<br />

suggest that it might be useful to teach such strategies to participants with<br />

aphasia <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation prior to tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> order to enhance their<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the novel stimuli. Secondly, as the images, skills and novel names<br />

were created and l<strong>in</strong>ked by the same person, was it possible that the mnemonic<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques, used by Group A (PS1, 4, 6, 7 and 10), were successful<br />

due to the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> some <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic l<strong>in</strong>k between the stimuli? Or would these<br />

techniques be similarly successful if the names, eye colour and skills were<br />

randomly assigned to each image? Additionally, prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study two<br />

anticipated observ<strong>in</strong>g the replication <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g performance by participants<br />

thus demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g reliability <strong>of</strong> results from prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study one.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!