05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This requires quite a robust model and as the <strong>in</strong>vestigation is evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> vocabulary a s<strong>in</strong>gle word process<strong>in</strong>g model based on the cognitive<br />

neuropsychological approach would be suitable (see section 2.7 and Figure 2i<br />

above).<br />

One drawback <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g this model is that it is <strong>of</strong>f-l<strong>in</strong>e or static i.e. a snapshot <strong>of</strong><br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle word-process<strong>in</strong>g ability at one moment <strong>in</strong> time, whereas learn<strong>in</strong>g is an onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

or dynamic process. While computer-based connectionist models may be<br />

more reflective <strong>of</strong> the dynamic process <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g, there is currently no<br />

behavioural model that will capture this learn<strong>in</strong>g process completely. The<br />

advantages <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g the cognitive neuropsychological model however, is that<br />

firstly, it is a s<strong>in</strong>gle word-process<strong>in</strong>g model and the current <strong>in</strong>vestigation aims to<br />

facilitate the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle words. This model is commonly used by cl<strong>in</strong>icians<br />

and researchers <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g impairments <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle word process<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>of</strong><br />

people with aphasia us<strong>in</strong>g such assessments as the PALPA (Kay et al. 1992)<br />

(see section 2.7). Adaptation <strong>of</strong> these assessments to the stimuli <strong>of</strong> the current<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation will enable the assessment <strong>of</strong> each participant’s ability to<br />

demonstrate learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the new vocabulary. See Appendix 2.1 for an<br />

explanation <strong>of</strong> the function <strong>of</strong> each box <strong>in</strong> the cognitive neuropsychological<br />

model used <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>vestigation with an example <strong>of</strong> assessments that are<br />

thought to target the various modules and pathways which help establish which<br />

spoken and written language functions are impaired.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> this model will enable the <strong>in</strong>vestigator to capture not only<br />

participants’ spoken and/or written output but also their recognition <strong>of</strong> the stimuli<br />

and any knowledge <strong>of</strong> the word forms or mean<strong>in</strong>gs that they may acquire. As the<br />

cognitive neuropsychological architecture <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle word process<strong>in</strong>g fulfils all<br />

requirements for facilitat<strong>in</strong>g the demonstration and evaluation <strong>of</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

new vocabulary it will be used as a model for this <strong>in</strong>vestigation. The ability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cognitive neuropsychological model to support the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and assessment<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!