05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.9 CONSIDERATIONS FOR INVESTIGATING NEW VOCABULARY LEARNING<br />

As this is a new type <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation there are no others available for replicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methodology, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g procedures or outcome measurements. Each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

studies discussed above (see section 2.8) <strong>in</strong>volved different stimuli, various<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques and procedures, had different learn<strong>in</strong>g criteria and<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> the demonstration <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g. Therefore the methodology was<br />

created utilis<strong>in</strong>g the most appropriate f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from exist<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g studies. The<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> the stimuli, the use <strong>of</strong> optimal learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques and an appropriate<br />

model <strong>of</strong> language process<strong>in</strong>g to facilitate the assessment and evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new learn<strong>in</strong>g will now be discussed.<br />

2.9.1 Stimuli<br />

Previous studies have used either non-words with already familiar concepts as<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs or real word forms with abstract symbols as paired concepts (see<br />

section 2.8.5 and sub-sections). In order to evaluate the ability to learn new<br />

vocabulary it must be proven that each participant had no previous memory<br />

trace <strong>of</strong> either the word form or mean<strong>in</strong>g. To ensure this the new or novel<br />

vocabulary had to be created. There is some <strong>in</strong>dication that verbs and nouns are<br />

processed differently (see section 2.8.3) and some studies have reported that<br />

people with aphasia appear to retrieve nouns more easily than verbs (Breed<strong>in</strong> et<br />

al. 1998), therefore <strong>in</strong> order to facilitate learn<strong>in</strong>g and retrieval <strong>of</strong> new vocabulary<br />

the new words will be designed to operate as nouns. Additionally, common<br />

nouns and proper nouns appear to operate differently (see section 2.8.3) with<br />

proper nouns act<strong>in</strong>g more like labels associated with a referent without semantic<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g. Theories <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g suggest that new vocabulary is acquired by<br />

form<strong>in</strong>g associations with already held words or concepts mak<strong>in</strong>g them more<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gful (Levelt et al., 1999). Therefore the new vocabulary must also be<br />

designed to be associated with already familiar words, and nouns are<br />

considered to be more appropriate for this purpose. The number <strong>of</strong> words<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> previous studies varied widely, as did the number <strong>of</strong> letters and<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!