05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3.1 Basel<strong>in</strong>e measures<br />

Prior to each tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g session, participants performed a listen<strong>in</strong>g and read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e recognition task. This comprised <strong>of</strong> five familiar creatures, five novel<br />

word forms to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed and five control non-words (see Appendix 4.6). As the<br />

creatures to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed were novel it was expected that the scores for each task<br />

would be zero recognition for these new items. These basel<strong>in</strong>e tasks allowed<br />

participants to display their knowledge <strong>of</strong> already familiar creatures and their<br />

ability to recognise non-words. It also provided practise <strong>of</strong> some assessments<br />

that they would undertake follow<strong>in</strong>g the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g period, thereby reduc<strong>in</strong>g test<br />

artefact effects. Replication <strong>of</strong> the basel<strong>in</strong>e tasks follow<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g would allow<br />

direct observation <strong>of</strong> vocabulary learned.<br />

4.3.2 Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />

Participants were <strong>in</strong>itially <strong>in</strong>troduced to and familiarised with the stimuli dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g procedure through a pre-exposure judgement task. Participants<br />

were required to look at each creature’s image and state if they recognised<br />

them. They were then shown the images aga<strong>in</strong> and asked for their op<strong>in</strong>ion/<br />

judgement <strong>of</strong> the creatures. At this stage participants had not been given any<br />

additional <strong>in</strong>formation about each creature. If a participant was unable to selfgenerate<br />

an op<strong>in</strong>ion the researcher asked two questions from the follow<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

does the creature look <strong>in</strong>telligent, honest, happy, angry, scary, friendly? This<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>in</strong>corporated the pre-exposure judgement task that<br />

would make the semantic basis for further staggered learn<strong>in</strong>g (Downes et al,<br />

1997; Kalla et al, 2001) (see section 2.9.2). The tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g then began us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

staggered learn<strong>in</strong>g approach where the phonological <strong>in</strong>formation (i.e. word form)<br />

was <strong>in</strong>troduced (see section 4.3.2.1) and followed by tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the semantic<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation (word mean<strong>in</strong>g and associated word l<strong>in</strong>ks) (see section 4.3.2.2).<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!