05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The methodology for the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and assessment <strong>of</strong> the new vocabulary for the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation was discussed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4 (see section 4.7) and is<br />

summarised aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Figure 5i above.<br />

5.3 MAIN INVESTIGATION FINDINGS<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> research question <strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong>vestigation was to ascerta<strong>in</strong> if adults with<br />

aphasia could learn new vocabulary despite hav<strong>in</strong>g language impairments as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> their stroke. As the literature has suggested that adults with aphasia<br />

have demonstrated the ability to learn other types <strong>of</strong> new <strong>in</strong>formation (see<br />

section 2.8.5.3) a hypo<strong>thesis</strong> was formed as follows:<br />

Hypo<strong>thesis</strong> one<br />

Adults with aphasia will demonstrate the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

new vocabulary<br />

This hypo<strong>thesis</strong> was addressed by simply observ<strong>in</strong>g the total raw scores for<br />

each participant’s performance on the assessments immediately follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g session (immediate recall). The degree <strong>of</strong> ability to learn the new<br />

vocabulary was assessed by totall<strong>in</strong>g the raw scores for each assessment.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> performance on all assessments are presented <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

(see section 5.5 –5.16). The highest possible score for each <strong>in</strong>dividual was 320<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g the total maximum score for the assessment tasks (immediate and<br />

delayed recall). The exception to this was participant P3 whose highest possible<br />

score was 280 as he was not assessed with all immediate recall tasks dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

methodological development <strong>in</strong> the pilot studies (see section 4.6.3).<br />

The immediate recall totals for each participant are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 5.1<br />

below. For convenience, participants are numbered accord<strong>in</strong>g to immediate<br />

recall score. As can be seen, the results support the hypo<strong>thesis</strong> that these 12<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!