05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

abilities <strong>of</strong> each participant and as a tool for predict<strong>in</strong>g their performance on new<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g tasks is discussed below (see section 6.5).<br />

6.3.5 Learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies<br />

The prelim<strong>in</strong>ary studies <strong>in</strong>dicated that no one learn<strong>in</strong>g strategy was suitable for<br />

all participants therefore, as previously discussed, participants <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation were given <strong>in</strong>formation expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g various learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques and<br />

were advised to use the one(s) they found most suitable (see section 3.3.3).<br />

Additionally, participants were given a maximum <strong>of</strong> 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong> each tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

session to promote <strong>in</strong>dependent rehearsal and consolidation <strong>of</strong> the newly<br />

learned words <strong>in</strong> any way they wished. In order to reduce errorful learn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

reduce assessment task artefact and to help structure the learn<strong>in</strong>g period,<br />

participants were given a number <strong>of</strong> tasks they could complete for this learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(see Appendix 4.7). Qualitative data <strong>in</strong>dicated that on the whole participants<br />

listened to the audio record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the details about the new words as well as<br />

practised the assessment tasks. Some participants wrote down all details as<br />

they rehearsed them and others practised the details aloud. However, the three<br />

participants with the lowest learn<strong>in</strong>g performance (C9, C10 and C11) were<br />

unable to structure their <strong>in</strong>dependent learn<strong>in</strong>g time and required direct guidance<br />

from the researcher who gave them the opportunity to complete the same tasks<br />

as other participants. This suggests poor plann<strong>in</strong>g ability and may reflect their<br />

cognitive impairments, <strong>in</strong> particular executive function. It could also reflect<br />

depression and anxiety levels <strong>of</strong> participants possibly exacerbat<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cognitive difficulties. It was noted that on the whole participants who employed<br />

more <strong>in</strong>dependent learn<strong>in</strong>g time were also more educated, perhaps reflect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the knowledge <strong>of</strong> how to learn effectively. These same people were also<br />

employed <strong>in</strong> occupations <strong>of</strong> higher complexity than other participants, perhaps<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g the usefulness <strong>of</strong> cognitive reserve <strong>in</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g process.<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!