05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3<br />

Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary Studies<br />

3.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

As discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2, there have been a small number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigations,<br />

which evaluated the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> vocabulary by healthy adults with no history <strong>of</strong><br />

bra<strong>in</strong> damage, adults with memory impairment and adults with aphasia (see<br />

section 2.8.5 and subsections). These <strong>in</strong>vestigations ma<strong>in</strong>ly focused on the<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> various learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques <strong>in</strong> new learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>vestigations employed various stimuli to observe and assess vocabulary<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g – foreign words, native language words considered to be unfamiliar to<br />

participants and non-words. However, these <strong>in</strong>vestigations essentially evaluated<br />

the ability <strong>of</strong> participants to pair or associate new <strong>in</strong>formation with already held<br />

representations rather than assess<strong>in</strong>g the ability <strong>of</strong> participants to acquire new<br />

vocabulary representations (i.e. new word form and new mean<strong>in</strong>g). As<br />

discussed (see section 2.7), there is currently no theoretical account or model <strong>of</strong><br />

aphasia rehabilitation which makes the process(es) <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the rehabilitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> aphasia explicit, and therefore it is not known if aphasia rehabilitation merely<br />

accesses already stored but currently <strong>in</strong>accessible memory traces <strong>of</strong> language,<br />

or if new cortical connections are be<strong>in</strong>g made through new learn<strong>in</strong>g. A first step<br />

<strong>in</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g this area <strong>of</strong> knowledge is to establish if adults with aphasia can <strong>in</strong><br />

fact demonstrate learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> new vocabulary despite residual language<br />

difficulties, which is what this <strong>in</strong>vestigation aimed to do. As this is a pioneer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation there is currently no normative data from the adult population on<br />

the acquisition <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> new vocabulary (number <strong>of</strong> items learned,<br />

strategies used etc.) or the appropriate type <strong>of</strong> stimuli to employ. Therefore<br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary studies were carried out with two ma<strong>in</strong> objectives. Firstly, the<br />

‘learnability’ <strong>of</strong> the newly created stimuli (i.e. new word forms with novel<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs) were evaluated by adults with normal language and cognitive<br />

processes also provid<strong>in</strong>g normative data. Secondly, a number <strong>of</strong> methodological<br />

matters <strong>in</strong> preparation for the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation were addressed.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!