05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

performance for some but not all participants. Therefore, as different learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

strategies appeared to be useful for different participants it was decided to<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduce a variety <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies to ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation participants and<br />

encourage them to use the one most suited to their particular learn<strong>in</strong>g style.<br />

As the novel word forms, images and associated mean<strong>in</strong>gs (i.e. skills) were<br />

created and l<strong>in</strong>ked by the same person, the second aim <strong>of</strong> this prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the stimuli to be learned. It aimed<br />

to assess if there were any <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic l<strong>in</strong>ks between the various components <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stimuli that facilitated the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> those participants who used the mnemonic<br />

technique above those who did not. To this end the novel images to be learned<br />

by Group A were randomly assigned their various attributes (i.e. name, skill and<br />

eye colour). The results (see Table 3.4) <strong>in</strong>dicated that the high scor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

participants from prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study one (Group A) were also the high scorers <strong>in</strong><br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study two. These results have two <strong>in</strong>dications. Firstly, high scores<br />

were achieved despite the randomisation <strong>of</strong> the stimuli attributes and therefore<br />

there did not appear to be any <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic l<strong>in</strong>ks between the novel stimuli that would<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence learn<strong>in</strong>g performance. Secondly, the persistent high performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Group A participants successfully achieved the third aim <strong>of</strong> this prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study<br />

<strong>in</strong> that they demonstrated the reliability <strong>of</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study one results by<br />

replicat<strong>in</strong>g their stronger learn<strong>in</strong>g performance.<br />

Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study two aga<strong>in</strong> demonstrated a wide range <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g ability by the<br />

normal population, further support<strong>in</strong>g the suggestion that a matched control was<br />

not required for the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation. No practice effects between prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

studies one and two were apparent and some people actually performed worse<br />

<strong>in</strong> the second study, although not significantly.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the assessment phase <strong>of</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study two it was noted that<br />

although all participants heard the new word forms on a number <strong>of</strong> occasions<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!